Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Mark Alex Varvares, M.D.


This page shows the publications Mark Varvares has written about Oropharyngeal Neoplasms.
Connection Strength

  1. 40-year incidence trends for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the United States. Oral Oncol. 2017 11; 74:90-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  2. Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Knowledge and Risk Perception of Human Papillomavirus and Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among a Predominantly Black Population. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 02 01; 143(2):117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  3. Race and sex disparities in long-term survival of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in the United States. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb; 142(2):521-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  4. Feeding Tube Placement Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr; 166(4):696-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  5. Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2021 08; 43(8):2434-2444.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  6. Prospective assessment of multiple HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2021 06; 117:105212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  7. Opioid Usage and Prescribing Predictors Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer. Laryngoscope. 2021 06; 131(6):E1888-E1894.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  8. Salvage of recurrence after surgery and adjuvant therapy: A systematic review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar - Apr; 39(2):223-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  9. Functional outcomes of sensate versus insensate free flap reconstruction in oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction: A systematic review. Head Neck. 2016 11; 38(11):1717-1721.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.