Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Rameen Beroukhim, M.D., Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Rameen Beroukhim and Sandro Santagata.
Connection Strength

2.170
  1. Neuronal differentiation and cell-cycle programs mediate response to BET-bromodomain inhibition in MYC-driven medulloblastoma. Nat Commun. 2019 06 03; 10(1):2400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  2. Erratum: Genomic landscape of high-grade meningiomas. NPJ Genom Med. 2017; 2:26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  3. Genomic landscape of high-grade meningiomas. NPJ Genom Med. 2017; 2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  4. Germline and somatic BAP1 mutations in high-grade rhabdoid meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2017 04 01; 19(4):535-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  5. Oncogenic PI3K mutations are as common as AKT1 and SMO mutations in meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 2016 05; 18(5):649-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  6. Expression profiles of 151 pediatric low-grade gliomas reveal molecular differences associated with location and histological subtype. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Nov; 17(11):1486-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  7. ARID1A and TERT promoter mutations in dedifferentiated meningioma. Cancer Genet. 2015 Jun; 208(6):345-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  8. Angiomatous meningiomas have a distinct genetic profile with multiple chromosomal polysomies including polysomy of chromosome 5. Oncotarget. 2014 Nov 15; 5(21):10596-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  9. Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations. Nat Genet. 2013 Mar; 45(3):285-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  10. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas. Nature. 2020 04; 580(7804):517-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  11. Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0187908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  12. Clinical Identification of Oncogenic Drivers and Copy-Number Alterations in Pituitary Tumors. Endocrinology. 2017 07 01; 158(7):2284-2291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  13. Clinical targeted exome-based sequencing in combination with genome-wide copy number profiling: precision medicine analysis of 203 pediatric brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jul 01; 19(7):986-996.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  14. Landscape of Genomic Alterations in Pituitary Adenomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 01; 23(7):1841-1851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  15. MYB-QKI rearrangements in angiocentric glioma drive tumorigenicity through a tripartite mechanism. Nat Genet. 2016 Mar; 48(3):273-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  16. Genomic landscape of intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2016 09; 125(3):525-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  17. Genomic Characterization of Brain Metastases Reveals Branched Evolution and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Cancer Discov. 2015 Nov; 5(11):1164-1177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  18. A prognostic cytogenetic scoring system to guide the adjuvant management of patients with atypical meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Feb; 18(2):269-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  19. Clinical implementation of integrated whole-genome copy number and mutation profiling for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Oct; 17(10):1344-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  20. Clinical multiplexed exome sequencing distinguishes adult oligodendroglial neoplasms from astrocytic and mixed lineage gliomas. Oncotarget. 2014 Sep 30; 5(18):8083-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  21. Adjuvant radiation therapy, local recurrence, and the need for salvage therapy in atypical meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Nov; 16(11):1547-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  22. Genomic analysis of diffuse pediatric low-grade gliomas identifies recurrent oncogenic truncating rearrangements in the transcription factor MYBL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14; 110(20):8188-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.