Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Catherine S Giess, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Catherine Giess and Ramin Khorasani.
Connection Strength

6.947
  1. RE: "Self-reported Burnout: Comparison of Radiologists to Nonradiologist Peers at a Large Academic Medical Center". Acad Radiol. 2021 07; 28(7):1035.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.952
  2. Self-reported Burnout: Comparison of Radiologists to Nonradiologist Peers at a Large Academic Medical Center. Acad Radiol. 2020 Nov 07.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.930
  3. Predictors of Self-Reported Burnout Among Radiology Faculty at a Large Academic Medical Center. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Dec; 17(12):1684-1691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.908
  4. Impact of an Information Technology-Enabled Quality Improvement Initiative on Timeliness of Patient Contact and Scheduling of Screening Mammography Recall. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 10; 213(4):880-885.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.847
  5. Patient, Radiologist, and Examination Characteristics Affecting Screening Mammography Recall Rates in a Large Academic Practice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):411-418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.793
  6. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  7. Electronic Worklist Improves Timeliness of Screening Mammogram Interpretation in an Urban Underserved Population. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Jun 23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  8. Radiology Workload Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Staff Redeployment. Acad Radiol. 2021 01; 28(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  9. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 09; 217(3):587-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  10. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Aug; 17(8):999-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  11. Comparing Breast and Abdominal Subspecialists' Follow-Up Recommendations for Incidental Liver Lesions on Breast MRI. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jun; 17(6):773-778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  12. Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Apr; 17(4):469-474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  13. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 03; 214(3):701-706.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  14. Clinical Impact of Second Opinion Radiology Consultation for Patients With Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jun; 16(6):814-823.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.