Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

HMS faculty, help us improve the algorithms in Profiles by uploading your CV!

Alexei V. Trofimov, Ph.D.


This page shows the publications co-authored by Alexei Trofimov and Harald Paganetti.
Connection Strength

  1. 4D Monte Carlo simulation of proton beam scanning: modelling of variations in time and space to study the interplay between scanning pattern and time-dependent patient geometry. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Mar 07; 50(5):983-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  2. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction. Phys Med Biol. 2017 04 21; 62(8):R49-R80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  3. Predicting Patient-specific Dosimetric Benefits of Proton Therapy for Skull-base Tumors Using a Geometric Knowledge-based Method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 04 01; 97(5):1087-1094.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  4. TH-CD-209-09: Quickly Identifying Good Candidates for Proton Therapy From Geometric Considerations. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3887-3888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  5. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Sep 01; 87(1):216-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  6. TH-A-116-02: Radiobiological Implications of Various Target and Beam Geometry Utilization in Treatment Planning for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2013 Jun; 40(6Part32):529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  7. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  8. SU-E-T-552: Maximizing the Biological Effect of Proton Dose Delivered with Scanned Beam. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  9. Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Aug 01; 80(5):1559-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  10. Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Apr; 95(1):3-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  11. Breathing interplay effects during proton beam scanning: simulation and statistical analysis. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jul 21; 54(14):N283-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  12. Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Feb; 86(2):148-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  13. Proton vs. photon radiotherapy for MR-guided dose escalation of intraprostatic lesions. Acta Oncol. 2021 Oct; 60(10):1283-1290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  14. SU-E-T-616: Comparison of Plan Dose Accuracy for Anterior Vs. Lateral Fields in Proton Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Med Phys. 2014 Jun; 41(6):369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  15. Proton beams to replace photon beams in radical dose treatments. Acta Oncol. 2003; 42(8):800-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.