Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

John J. Rosowski, Ph.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications John Rosowski has written about Pressure.
Connection Strength

1.816
  1. Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 05; 141(5):3274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  2. Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:144-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  3. Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):2852-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  4. Inner-ear sound pressures near the base of the cochlea in chinchilla: further investigation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr; 133(4):2208-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  5. Evidence of inner ear contribution in bone conduction in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:66-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  6. Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct; 132(4):2437-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  7. Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear. Hear Res. 2012 Nov; 293(1-2):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  8. Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction. Hear Res. 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):83-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  9. Middle ear function and cochlear input impedance in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar; 127(3):1397-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  10. Middle-ear pressure gain and cochlear partition differential pressure in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  11. Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):114-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  12. Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Mar; 10(1):23-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  13. The radiation impedance of the external ear of cat: measurements and applications. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Nov; 84(5):1695-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  14. Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):932-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  15. Testing a method for quantifying the output of implantable middle ear hearing devices. Audiol Neurootol. 2007; 12(4):265-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  16. The effect of immobilizing the gerbil's pars flaccida on the middle-ear's response to static pressure. Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):183-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  17. Effects of middle-ear static pressure on pars tensa and pars flaccida of gerbil ears. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):146-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  18. Effect of freezing and thawing on stapes-cochlear input impedance in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):215-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  19. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2018 09; 367:17-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  21. Current status and future challenges of tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998; 255(5):221-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  22. Mechanics of type IV tympanoplasty: experimental findings and surgical implications. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997 Jan; 106(1):49-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  23. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep; 100(3):1602-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  24. Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan; 36(1):172-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  25. Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures. Audiol Neurootol. 2015; 20(1):62-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  26. Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb; 133(2):918-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  27. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:105-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):43-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  29. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones. Ear Hear. 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  30. Anatomy of the normal human cochlear aqueduct with functional implications. Hear Res. 1997 May; 107(1-2):9-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  31. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res. 1992 Jan; 57(2):245-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.