Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Login and Edit functionaility are currrently unavailable.

John J. Rosowski, Ph.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications John Rosowski has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.319
  1. Limitations of present models of blast-induced sound power conduction through the external and middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 11; 146(5):3978.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  2. MEMRO 2018 - Middle ear mechanics - Technology and Otosurgery. Hear Res. 2019 07; 378:1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  3. Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):1569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  4. Tympanic membrane surface motions in forward and reverse middle ear transmissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 01; 145(1):272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  5. MEMRO 2015 - Basic science meets clinical otology. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  6. Response of the human tympanic membrane to transient acoustic and mechanical stimuli: Preliminary results. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:15-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  7. In-plane and out-of-plane motions of the human tympanic membrane. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan; 139(1):104-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  8. Restoration of middle-ear input in fluid-filled middle ears by controlled introduction of air or a novel air-filled implant. Hear Res. 2015 Oct; 328:8-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  9. Three-dimensional vibrometry of the human eardrum with stroboscopic lensless digital holography. J Biomed Opt. 2015 May; 20(5):051028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  10. The Effect of Ear Canal Orientation on Tympanic Membrane Motion and the Sound Field Near the Tympanic Membrane. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Aug; 16(4):413-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  11. Simultaneous full-field 3-D vibrometry of the human eardrum using spatial-bandwidth multiplexed holography. J Biomed Opt. 2015; 20(11):111202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  12. Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec; 136(6):3132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  13. Full-field transient vibrometry of the human tympanic membrane by local phase correlation and high-speed holography. J Biomed Opt. 2014 Sep; 19(9):96001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Comparisons of the mechanics of partial and total ossicular replacement prostheses with cartilage in a cadaveric temporal bone preparation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Aug; 134(8):776-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Factors that introduce intrasubject variability into ear-canal absorbance measurements. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul; 34 Suppl 1:60S-64S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. An overview of wideband immittance measurements techniques and terminology: you say absorbance, I say reflectance. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul; 34 Suppl 1:9S-16S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear. Hear Res. 2012 Nov; 293(1-2):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction. Hear Res. 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):83-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb; 33(1):19-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. New data on the motion of the normal and reconstructed tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec; 32(9):1559-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  21. Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):66-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  22. Middle ear mechanics of cartilage tympanoplasty evaluated by laser holography and vibrometry. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec; 30(8):1209-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  23. Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):114-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  24. Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):78-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  25. Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4-25 kHz. Hear Res. 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):83-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Mar; 10(1):23-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Apr; 29(3):282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  28. Clinical utility of laser-Doppler vibrometer measurements in live normal and pathologic human ears. Ear Hear. 2008 Jan; 29(1):3-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  29. Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):932-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  30. A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):943-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  31. Clinical investigation and mechanism of air-bone gaps in large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Jul; 116(7):532-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  32. Testing a method for quantifying the output of implantable middle ear hearing devices. Audiol Neurootol. 2007; 12(4):265-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  33. The effect of methodological differences in the measurement of stapes motion in live and cadaver ears. Audiol Neurootol. 2006; 11(3):183-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  34. The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):53-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  35. Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear's response to sound: evidence for a flexible ossicular chain. Hear Res. 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):60-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  36. Measurements of glottal structure dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1373-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  37. Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms. Otol Neurotol. 2004 May; 25(3):323-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  38. A normative study of tympanic membrane motion in humans using a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). Hear Res. 2004 Jan; 187(1-2):85-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  39. Diagnostic utility of laser-Doppler vibrometry in conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Mar; 24(2):165-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  40. Middle ear mechanics of Type III tympanoplasty (stapes columella): II. Clinical studies. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Mar; 24(2):186-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  41. Effects of middle-ear static pressure on pars tensa and pars flaccida of gerbil ears. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):146-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  42. Effect of freezing and thawing on stapes-cochlear input impedance in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):215-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  43. Bone-conduction hyperacusis induced by superior canal dehiscence in human: the underlying mechanism. Sci Rep. 2020 10 06; 10(1):16564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  44. Effect of Middle-Ear Pathology on High-Frequency Ear Canal Reflectance Measurements in the Frequency and Time Domains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 12; 20(6):529-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  45. Combined high-speed holographic shape and full-field displacement measurements of tympanic membrane. J Biomed Opt. 2018 09; 24(3):1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  46. Toynbee Memorial Lecture 1997. Middle ear mechanics in normal, diseased and reconstructed ears. J Laryngol Otol. 1998 Aug; 112(8):715-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  47. Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2018 09; 367:17-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  48. Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall-up versus canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Jun; 118(6):751-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  49. Correlations between pathologic changes in the stapes and conductive hearing loss in otosclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998 Apr; 107(4):319-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  50. Current status and future challenges of tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998; 255(5):221-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  51. Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2754-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  52. Analysis of middle ear mechanics and application to diseased and reconstructed ears. Am J Otol. 1997 Mar; 18(2):139-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  53. Mechanics of type IV tympanoplasty: experimental findings and surgical implications. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997 Jan; 106(1):49-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  54. Treatment of otitis media by transtympanic delivery of antibiotics. Sci Transl Med. 2016 09 14; 8(356):356ra120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  55. Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations. Hear Res. 2016 11; 341:19-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  56. Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):30-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  57. Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:191-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  58. The Audiometric and Mechanical Effects of Partial Ossicular Discontinuity. Ear Hear. 2016 Mar-Apr; 37(2):206-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  59. Middle ear mechanics of type IV and type V tympanoplasty: I. Model analysis and predictions. Am J Otol. 1995 Sep; 16(5):555-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  60. Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology. Hear Res. 2016 Mar; 333:225-234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  61. Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Am J Otol. 1995 Jul; 16(4):486-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  62. Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan; 36(1):172-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  63. Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures. Audiol Neurootol. 2015; 20(1):62-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  64. Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Oct; 96(4):2184-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  65. Viscoelastic properties of the human tympanic membrane studied with stroboscopic holography and finite element modeling. Hear Res. 2014 Jun; 312:69-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  66. Re: Response to Drs Carey et al. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 38(5):443; discussion 443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  67. Assessment of ear disorders using power reflectance. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul; 34 Suppl 1:48S-53S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  68. Consensus statement: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul; 34 Suppl 1:78S-79S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  69. Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles. Hear Res. 2013 Oct; 304:49-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  70. Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb; 133(2):918-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  71. Re: Superior semicircular canal syndrome should be searching for an alternative pathology. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013 Feb; 38(1):97-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  72. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:105-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  73. Comparison of ear-canal reflectance and umbo velocity in patients with conductive hearing loss: a preliminary study. Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb; 33(1):35-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  74. Histopathology of the temporal bone in a case of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jan; 121(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  75. The effects of external- and middle-ear filtering on auditory threshold and noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul; 90(1):124-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  76. Impedance matching, optimum velocity, and ideal middle ears. Hear Res. 1991 May; 53(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  77. Cadaver middle ears as models for living ears: comparisons of middle ear input immittance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990 May; 99(5 Pt 1):403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  78. Evaluation of round window stimulation using the floating mass transducer by intracochlear sound pressure measurements in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Apr; 31(3):506-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  79. Anatomy of the distal incus in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec; 10(4):485-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  80. Optoelectronic holographic otoscope for measurement of nano-displacements in tympanic membranes. J Biomed Opt. 2009 May-Jun; 14(3):034023.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  81. Measurements of stapes velocity in live human ears. Hear Res. 2009 Mar; 249(1-2):54-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  82. Isolated fracture of the manubrium of the malleus. J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Sep; 122(9):898-904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  83. Investigation of the mechanics of Type III stapes columella tympanoplasty using laser-Doppler vibrometry. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Sep; 28(6):782-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  84. Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb; 28(2):250-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  85. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence mimicking otosclerotic hearing loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 65:137-145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  86. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as postpartum vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Sep; 27(6):756-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  87. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Feb; 27(2):136-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  88. Experimental and clinical studies of malleus fixation. Laryngoscope. 2005 Jan; 115(1):147-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  89. Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid. Hear Res. 2004 Sep; 195(1-2):103-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  90. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar; 25(2):121-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  91. Middle-ear mechanics of Type III tympanoplasty (stapes columella): I. Experimental studies. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Mar; 24(2):176-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  92. Correlation of impedance at the TM with stapes velocity? Reply to the letter of D.H. Keefe. Hear Res. 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):153-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  93. Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1432-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  94. Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. II. A simple model. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  95. How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission? Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jan; 121(2):169-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  96. Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):43-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  97. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones. Ear Hear. 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  98. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  99. Anatomy of the normal human cochlear aqueduct with functional implications. Hear Res. 1997 May; 107(1-2):9-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  100. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep; 100(3):1602-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  101. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 May; 99(5):3044-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  102. Middle ear mechanics of type IV and type V tympanoplasty: II. Clinical analysis and surgical implications. Am J Otol. 1995 Sep; 16(5):565-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  103. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res. 1992 Jan; 57(2):245-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.