Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Jonathan B. Kruskal, Ph.D., M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Jonathan Kruskal and Bettina Siewert.
Connection Strength

5.287
  1. Emotional Harm in the Radiology Department: Analysis of an Underrecognized Preventable Error. Radiology. 2022 03; 302(3):613-619.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.971
  2. Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of Radiologists: Strategies and Tools for Simplifying a Complex Process. Radiographics. 2018 10; 38(6):1593-1608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.781
  3. Transitioning from peer review to peer learning for abdominal radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Mar; 41(3):416-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.653
  4. Practice policy and quality initiatives: strategies for optimizing staff safety in a radiology department. Radiographics. 2013 Jan-Feb; 33(1):245-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  5. Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance. Radiographics. 2008 May-Jun; 28(3):623-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  6. Transitioning From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Report of the 2020 Peer Learning Summit. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov; 17(11):1499-1508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  7. Improving Imaging Care for Diverse, Marginalized, and Vulnerable Patient Populations. Radiographics. 2018 Oct; 38(6):1833-1844.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  8. The Road to Wellness: Engagement Strategies to Help Radiologists Achieve Joy at Work. Radiographics. 2018 10; 38(6):1651-1664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  9. Measuring and improving the patient experience in radiology. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 04; 42(4):1259-1267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  10. Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Apr; 11(4):397-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  11. Improving resident education in quality improvement: role for a resident quality improvement director. Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr; 20(4):500-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  12. Lessons learned from quality assurance: errors in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis on ultrasound and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar; 196(3):597-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  13. Quality initiatives: quality improvement grand rounds at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: CT colonography performance review after an adverse event. Radiographics. 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  14. Managing an acute adverse event in a radiology department. Radiographics. 2008 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1237-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  15. A quality assurance elective for radiology residents. Acad Radiol. 2007 Feb; 14(2):239-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  16. Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology. 2006 Oct; 241(1):175-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  17. Multiple-image in-room CT imaging guidance for interventional procedures. Radiology. 2006 Jun; 239(3):863-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  18. Impact of CT-guided drainage in the treatment of diverticular abscesses: size matters. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar; 186(3):680-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  19. CT findings in runner's colitis. Abdom Imaging. 2006 Jan-Feb; 31(1):54-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  20. Utility and safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of salivary gland masses including a cytologist's review. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Jun; 23(6):777-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  21. Acute appendicitis: effect of increased use of CT on selecting patients earlier. Radiology. 2003 Feb; 226(2):521-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  22. Radiologists' Experience With Patient Interactions in the Era of Open Access of Patients to Radiology Reports. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Nov; 15(11):1573-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.