Co-Author
This page shows the publications co-authored by Sanjay Divakaran and Ron Blankstein.
Connection Strength
8.852
-
FDG PET imaging in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis vs. prognosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Oct 04.
Score: 0.962
-
Long-Term Outcomes Following Myocardial Infarction in Young Adult Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma: The YOUNG-MI Registry. JACC CardioOncol. 2021 Jun; 3(2):319-321.
Score: 0.942
-
Diabetes Is Associated With Worse Long-term Outcomes in Young Adults After Myocardial Infarction: The Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. Diabetes Care. 2020 08; 43(8):1843-1850.
Score: 0.836
-
Role of Imaging in Evaluating Infiltrative Heart Disease. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Jan; 19(1):3.
Score: 0.692
-
Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management. Br J Radiol. 2015 Feb; 88(1046):20140594.
Score: 0.600
-
Association of inflammatory disease and long-term outcomes among young adults with myocardial infarction: the Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI Registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 03 11; 29(2):352-359.
Score: 0.248
-
Impact of coronary artery calcium testing on patient management. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Dec 17.
Score: 0.244
-
Coronary vasomotor dysfunction portends worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Nov 24.
Score: 0.243
-
Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Long-term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction: The Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI Registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 08 01; 6(8):880-888.
Score: 0.238
-
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and elevated lipoprotein(a) among young adults with myocardial infarction: The Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 07 23; 28(8):e12-e14.
Score: 0.237
-
Study of lipoprotein(a) and its impact on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Design and rationale of the Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry. Clin Cardiol. 2020 Nov; 43(11):1209-1215.
Score: 0.223
-
Association of Smoking Cessation and Survival Among Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction in the Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 07 01; 3(7):e209649.
Score: 0.220
-
Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 06 09; 75(22):2804-2815.
Score: 0.220
-
Cardiovascular Mortality After Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 03 10; 75(9):1003-1013.
Score: 0.216
-
Appropriateness of inpatient stress testing: Implications for development of clinical decision support mechanisms and future criteria. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 10; 28(5):1988-1997.
Score: 0.211
-
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Very Young Adults Who Experience Myocardial Infarction: The Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. Am J Med. 2020 05; 133(5):605-612.e1.
Score: 0.211
-
Response by Divakaran et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Diagnostic Accuracy of Advanced Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: An Imaging-Histologic Correlation Study in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation". Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 08; 12(8):e009622.
Score: 0.207
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Advanced Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 06; 12(6):e008975.
Score: 0.205
-
Long-Term Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2018 12 11; 138(24):2855-2857.
Score: 0.198
-
When Can We Defer Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 09; 11(9):1311-1314.
Score: 0.194
-
Cocaine and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 06 05; 71(22):2540-2551.
Score: 0.188
-
Study of young patients with myocardial infarction: Design and rationale of the YOUNG-MI Registry. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov; 40(11):955-961.
Score: 0.181
-
Enhanced Education for Noninvasive Cardiac Testing. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 05 01; 177(5):746.
Score: 0.177
-
Incremental prognostic value of kidney function decline over coronary artery disease for cardiovascular event prediction after coronary computed tomography. Kidney Int. 2015 Jul; 88(1):152-9.
Score: 0.151
-
Comparison of the use of downstream tests after exercise treadmill testing by cardiologists versus noncardiologists. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15; 114(2):305-11.
Score: 0.144
-
Association of Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve With Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The Microvascular Disease in Aortic Stenosis (MIDAS) Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 01 01; 7(1):93-99.
Score: 0.061
-
Cardiac Sarcoidosis: When and How to Treat Inflammation. Card Fail Rev. 2021 Mar; 7:e17.
Score: 0.061
-
Low coronary flow relative to myocardial mass predicts heart failure in symptomatic hypertensive patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 07.
Score: 0.060
-
Role of Exercise Treadmill Testing in the Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 02; 15(2):312-321.
Score: 0.060
-
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 07 06; 10(13):e018555.
Score: 0.059
-
Impaired Coronary Vasodilator Reserve and Adverse Prognosis in Patients With Systemic Inflammatory Disorders. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 11; 14(11):2212-2220.
Score: 0.058
-
Coronary vasomotor dysfunction in cancer survivors treated with thoracic irradiation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 12; 28(6):2976-2987.
Score: 0.055
-
Hypertensive coronary microvascular dysfunction: a subclinical marker of end organ damage and heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2020 07 01; 41(25):2366-2375.
Score: 0.055
-
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with psoriasis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Feb; 29(1):37-42.
Score: 0.055
-
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Left Ventricular Remodeling, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Impairment. Circulation. 2020 01 07; 141(1):21-33.
Score: 0.053
-
Coronary microvascular dysfunction, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes in aortic stenosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Apr; 28(2):579-588.
Score: 0.051
-
Management of Coronary Artery Calcium and Coronary CTA Findings. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2015; 8(6):18.
Score: 0.038
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.