Co-Author
This page shows the publications co-authored by Larissa Nekhlyudov and Suzanne Fletcher.
Connection Strength
3.203
-
Ten-year risk of diagnostic mammograms and invasive breast procedures after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Apr 18; 104(8):614-21.
Score: 0.498
-
Adherence to long-term surveillance mammography among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 01; 27(19):3211-6.
Score: 0.407
-
Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference? Health Expect. 2008 Dec; 11(4):366-75.
Score: 0.395
-
Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jun 27; 165(12):1370-4.
Score: 0.312
-
Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar; 18(3):182-9.
Score: 0.265
-
Breast self-examination: who teaches it, who is taught, and how often? (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002 May; 13(4):343-51.
Score: 0.250
-
Is it time to stop teaching breast self-examination? CMAJ. 2001 Jun 26; 164(13):1851-2.
Score: 0.236
-
Risk Prediction for Local Breast Cancer Recurrence Among Women with DCIS Treated in a Community Practice: A Nested, Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3:S502-8.
Score: 0.155
-
Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan; 174(1):114-21.
Score: 0.141
-
What women wish they knew before prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug; 30(4):285-91; quiz 292-3.
Score: 0.090
-
Contentment with quality of life among breast cancer survivors with and without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 20; 24(9):1350-6.
Score: 0.082
-
Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes. Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Apr; 16(4):275-8.
Score: 0.078
-
Women's decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005; (35):55-60.
Score: 0.075
-
Risk factors for non-invasive and invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun; 139(2):453-60.
Score: 0.034
-
Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ among patients cared for in large integrated health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2010 May; 16(5):351-60.
Score: 0.027
-
Relationship between clinical and pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ and patient age: an analysis of 657 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Dec; 33(12):1802-8.
Score: 0.026
-
Declining recurrence among ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with breast-conserving surgery in the community setting. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11(6):R85.
Score: 0.026
-
Positive, negative, and disparate--women's differing long-term psychosocial experiences of bilateral or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast J. 2008 Jan-Feb; 14(1):25-32.
Score: 0.023
-
Clinical and pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ associated with the presence of flat epithelial atypia: an analysis of 543 patients. Mod Pathol. 2007 Nov; 20(11):1149-55.
Score: 0.023
-
Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb; 14(2):686-94.
Score: 0.021
-
Complications following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005; (35):61-6.
Score: 0.019
-
Race and ethnicity: comparing medical records to self-reports. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005; (35):72-4.
Score: 0.019
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.