Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Fabienne Catya Bourgeois, M.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications Fabienne Bourgeois has written about Electronic Health Records.
Connection Strength

1.363
  1. Preserving privacy for pediatric patients and families: use of confidential note types in pediatric ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 11 01; 27(11):1705-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.269
  2. A patient and family reporting system for perceived ambulatory note mistakes: experience at 3 U.S. healthcare centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 12 01; 26(12):1566-1573.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  3. OpenNotes: Toward a Participatory Pediatric Health System. Pediatrics. 2018 10; 142(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  4. Ethical Challenges Raised by OpenNotes for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients. Pediatrics. 2018 06; 141(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  5. Mychildren's: integration of a personally controlled health record with a tethered patient portal for a pediatric and adolescent population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14; 2009:65-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  6. Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):e791-e799.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  7. Speaking up about patient-perceived serious visit note errors: Patient and family experiences and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 03 18; 28(4):685-694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  8. The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018 05 24; 20(5):e191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  9. Empowering Informal Caregivers with Health Information: OpenNotes as a Safety Strategy. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 03; 44(3):130-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.