Edward L. Giovannucci, D.Sc., M.D.
Co-Author
This page shows the publications co-authored by Edward Giovannucci and NaNa Keum.
Connection Strength
11.568
-
Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 12; 16(12):713-732.
Score: 0.832
-
Long-term patterns of fasting blood glucose levels and pancreatic cancer incidence. Cancer Causes Control. 2018 01; 29(1):135-142.
Score: 0.737
-
Calcium as a chemopreventive agent against colorectal neoplasm: does obesity play a role? Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Aug; 28(8):853-856.
Score: 0.717
-
Association of Physical Activity by Type and Intensity With Digestive System Cancer Risk. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Sep 01; 2(9):1146-53.
Score: 0.676
-
Sedentary behaviors and light-intensity activities in relation to colorectal cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2016 May 01; 138(9):2109-17.
Score: 0.645
-
Association Between Obesity and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Modification by Hormone Therapy Use. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov; 1(8):1170-1.
Score: 0.638
-
Adult weight gain and adiposity-related cancers: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb; 107(2).
Score: 0.610
-
Adult weight gain and adiposity-related cancers: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar; 107(3).
Score: 0.605
-
Calcium intake and colorectal adenoma risk: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 01; 136(7):1680-7.
Score: 0.589
-
Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Cancer. 2014 Oct 15; 135(8):1940-8.
Score: 0.571
-
Leisure-time physical activity and endometrial cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2014 Aug 01; 135(3):682-94.
Score: 0.569
-
Folic acid fortification and colorectal cancer risk. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Mar; 46(3 Suppl 1):S65-72.
Score: 0.568
-
Association between weight cycling and risk of kidney cancer: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Sep; 32(9):1029-1038.
Score: 0.235
-
Physical activity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: assessing the impact of reverse causation and measurement error in two large prospective cohorts. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar; 36(3):275-285.
Score: 0.229
-
Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 23; 12(8).
Score: 0.221
-
Resistance training and total and site-specific cancer risk: a prospective cohort study of 33,787 US men. Br J Cancer. 2020 08; 123(4):666-672.
Score: 0.219
-
Gastric and duodenal ulcers, periodontal disease, and risk of bladder cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Apr; 31(4):383-391.
Score: 0.215
-
Different dietary fibre sources and risks of colorectal cancer and adenoma: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Nutr. 2019 09 28; 122(6):605-615.
Score: 0.206
-
Comparison of the association of predicted fat mass, body mass index, and other obesity indicators with type 2 diabetes risk: two large prospective studies in US men and women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Nov; 33(11):1113-1123.
Score: 0.194
-
Association of dietary insulinemic potential and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 08 01; 108(2):363-370.
Score: 0.193
-
Predicted lean body mass, fat mass, and all cause and cause specific mortality in men: prospective US cohort study. BMJ. 2018 07 03; 362:k2575.
Score: 0.192
-
Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for lean body mass, fat mass and percent fat in adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006. Br J Nutr. 2017 Nov; 118(10):858-866.
Score: 0.183
-
Dietary glycemic and insulin scores and colorectal cancer survival by tumor molecular biomarkers. Int J Cancer. 2017 06 15; 140(12):2648-2656.
Score: 0.176
-
Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: Results from the nurses' health study and health professionals follow-up study. Int J Cancer. 2016 11 15; 139(10):2232-42.
Score: 0.168
-
Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology in the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep; 106(9):1599-607.
Score: 0.168
-
Circulating levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 molar ratio and colorectal adenomas: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Dec; 39(6):1026-35.
Score: 0.158
-
Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and colorectal adenomas: A meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2015 Oct; 64(10):1324-33.
Score: 0.156
-
Adiposity and mortality in Korean adults: a population-based prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 21.
Score: 0.056
-
Mushroom Consumption and Risk of Total and Site-Specific Cancer in Two Large U.S. Prospective Cohorts. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 08; 12(8):517-526.
Score: 0.051
-
Physical activity during adolescence and risk of colorectal adenoma later in life: results from the Nurses' Health Study II. Br J Cancer. 2019 07; 121(1):86-94.
Score: 0.051
-
Calcium Intake and Risk of Colorectal Cancer According to Tumor-infiltrating T Cells. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 05; 12(5):283-294.
Score: 0.050
-
Sedentary Behaviors, TV Viewing Time, and Risk of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Nov; 2(4):pky073.
Score: 0.050
-
Smoking and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Sub-Classified by Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 01 01; 111(1):42-51.
Score: 0.050
-
Dietary intake and blood concentrations of antioxidants and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 11 01; 108(5):1069-1091.
Score: 0.049
-
Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer Relates to Immune Response Differentially by Tumor Microsatellite Instability Status. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 11; 6(11):1327-1336.
Score: 0.049
-
Vitamin D status after colorectal cancer diagnosis and patient survival according to immune response to tumour. Eur J Cancer. 2018 11; 103:98-107.
Score: 0.049
-
Garlic intake and gastric cancer risk: Results from two large prospective US cohort studies. Int J Cancer. 2018 09 01; 143(5):1047-1053.
Score: 0.047
-
GWAS for male-pattern baldness identifies 71 susceptibility loci explaining 38% of the risk. Nat Commun. 2017 11 17; 8(1):1584.
Score: 0.046
-
Tumor expression of calcium sensing receptor and colorectal cancer survival: Results from the nurses' health study and health professionals follow-up study. Int J Cancer. 2017 12 15; 141(12):2471-2479.
Score: 0.045
-
Influence of dietary insulin scores on survival in colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 26; 117(7):1079-1087.
Score: 0.045
-
Calcium intake and risk of colorectal cancer according to expression status of calcium-sensing receptor (CASR). Gut. 2018 08; 67(8):1475-1483.
Score: 0.045
-
Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 06 01; 46(3):1029-1056.
Score: 0.045
-
Aspirin Use and Colorectal Cancer Survival According to Tumor CD274 (Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1) Expression Status. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 01; 35(16):1836-1844.
Score: 0.044
-
Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Med. 2016 Dec 05; 14(1):207.
Score: 0.043
-
Associations between nut consumption and inflammatory biomarkers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 09; 104(3):722-8.
Score: 0.042
-
Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2016 Jun 14; 353:i2716.
Score: 0.042
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.