Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Kirk R. Daffner, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Kirk Daffner and Dorene Rentz.
Connection Strength

2.171
  1. Use of IQ-adjusted norms to predict progressive cognitive decline in highly intelligent older individuals. Neuropsychology. 2004 Jan; 18(1):38-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  2. Age-related decline in bottom-up processing and selective attention in the very old. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun; 31(3):261-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  3. Investigating the age-related "anterior shift" in the scalp distribution of the P3b component using principal component analysis. Psychophysiology. 2014 Jul; 51(7):620-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  4. The dissociation between early and late selection in older adults. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec; 25(12):2189-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  5. Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults. Brain Res. 2013 Mar 07; 1499:69-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  6. The influence of executive capacity on selective attention and subsequent processing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  7. Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity? Biol Psychol. 2012 Feb; 89(2):398-407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  8. Does compensatory neural activity survive old-old age? Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 01; 54(1):427-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  9. Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs. Biol Psychol. 2009 Sep; 82(1):33-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  10. Intelligence quotient-adjusted memory impairment is associated with abnormal single photon emission computed tomography perfusion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Sep; 13(5):821-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  11. Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 01; 39(1):441-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  12. Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults. Neuropsychology. 2007 May; 21(3):291-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  13. IQ-based norms for highly intelligent adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec; 20(4):637-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  14. Increased responsiveness to novelty is associated with successful cognitive aging. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct; 18(10):1759-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  15. Age-related differences in attention to novelty among cognitively high performing adults. Biol Psychol. 2006 Apr; 72(1):67-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  16. Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2005 Oct; 26(9):1283-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  17. Frontal and parietal components of a cerebral network mediating voluntary attention to novel events. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15; 15(2):294-313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  18. Pathophysiology underlying diminished attention to novel events in patients with early AD. Neurology. 2001 May 22; 56(10):1377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  19. Disruption of attention to novel events after frontal lobe injury in humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jan; 68(1):18-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  20. Pupil assay and Alzheimer's disease: a critical analysis. Neurology. 1999 Feb; 52(3):673-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. False recognition in Alzheimer disease: evidence from categorized pictures. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2003 Mar; 16(1):16-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  22. Use of a false recognition paradigm in an Alzheimer's disease clinical trial: a pilot study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2002 Mar-Apr; 17(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  23. Response. Science. 1995 Mar 17; 267(5204):1580-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  24. A potential noninvasive neurobiological test for Alzheimer's disease. Science. 1994 Nov 11; 266(5187):1051-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.