Co-Author
This page shows the publications co-authored by Jeremy Ruskin and Jagmeet Singh.
Connection Strength
3.981
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MGH experience. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct; 10(4 Suppl):44-54.
Score: 0.317
-
The coronary venous anatomy: a segmental approach to aid cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 05; 46(1):68-74.
Score: 0.312
-
Images in cardiovascular medicine. Sleep (vagal)-induced atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004 Jul 27; 110(4):e32-3.
Score: 0.292
-
Atrial fibrillation endpoints: hospitalization. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Jul; 1(2 Suppl):B31-4, discussion B34-5.
Score: 0.291
-
New classification scheme for atrial fibrillation symptom severity and burden. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15; 114(2):260-5.
Score: 0.144
-
Renin-angiotensin-system modulators and the incidence of atrial fibrillation following hospitalization for coronary artery disease. Europace. 2012 Sep; 14(9):1287-93.
Score: 0.125
-
Inpatient vs. elective outpatient cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation and long-term clinical outcome. Europace. 2010 Dec; 12(12):1745-9.
Score: 0.112
-
Impact of segmental left ventricle lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2010 May; 7(5):639-44.
Score: 0.107
-
Interlead distance and left ventricular lead electrical delay predict reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 May; 33(5):575-82.
Score: 0.107
-
Integrating functional and anatomical information to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jan; 12(1):52-7.
Score: 0.106
-
Impact of tricuspid regurgitation and prior coronary bypass surgery on the geometry of the coronary sinus: a rotational coronary angiography study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr; 21(4):436-40.
Score: 0.105
-
Cardiac resynchronization in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 07; 52(15):1239-46.
Score: 0.098
-
Usefulness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the management of Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2008 May 01; 101(9):1371-2.
Score: 0.094
-
Masking of sinus rhythm by recipient atrial flutter in a patient with orthotopic heart transplant. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Aug; 19(8):876-7.
Score: 0.093
-
Role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with methadone-induced long QT syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15; 101(2):209-11.
Score: 0.093
-
Usefulness of high-speed rotational coronary venous angiography during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Nov 15; 100(10):1561-5.
Score: 0.092
-
The impact of age and gender on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Nov; 30(11):1344-8.
Score: 0.092
-
Integrating functional and anatomical information to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Aug; 30(8):1021-2.
Score: 0.090
-
Variability of coronary venous anatomy in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a high-speed rotational venography study. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep; 4(9):1155-62.
Score: 0.089
-
Elevated estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure is associated with an adverse clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May; 30(5):603-7.
Score: 0.088
-
Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome. Eur Heart J. 2007 May; 28(9):1143-8.
Score: 0.088
-
"Dialing-in" cardiac resynchronization therapy: overcoming constraints of the coronary venous anatomy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct; 17(1):51-8.
Score: 0.087
-
Coronary venospasm causing chest pain during implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Aug; 4(8):1108-9.
Score: 0.086
-
Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Nov; 3(11):1285-92.
Score: 0.084
-
Left ventricular lead proximity to an akinetic segment and impact on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Jun; 17(6):623-7.
Score: 0.083
-
Usefulness of a novel "response score" to predict hemodynamic and clinical outcome from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 15; 97(12):1732-6.
Score: 0.082
-
Factors influencing appropriate firing of the implanted defibrillator for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation: findings from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 01; 46(9):1712-20.
Score: 0.079
-
Radiographic left ventricular-right ventricular interlead distance predicts the acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 01; 96(5):685-90.
Score: 0.079
-
Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary sinus using rotational angiography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun; 16(6):675-6.
Score: 0.077
-
Progressive ventricular dysfunction among nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: baseline predictors and associated clinical outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Nov; 11(11):1991-8.
Score: 0.037
-
Predictors of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 01; 5(4):762-72.
Score: 0.032
-
Unpredictable battery depletion of St Jude Atlas II and Atlas+ II HF implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2012 May; 9(5):717-20.
Score: 0.030
-
Absence of left ventricular apical rocking and atrial-ventricular dyssynchrony predicts non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan; 13(1):86-94.
Score: 0.030
-
A novel lead configuration for optimal spatio-temporal detection of intracardiac repolarization alternans. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun; 4(3):407-17.
Score: 0.029
-
Electrocardiographic characteristics in right ventricular vs biventricular pacing in patients with paced right bundle-branch block QRS pattern. J Electrocardiol. 2011 Mar-Apr; 44(2):289-95.
Score: 0.029
-
Multiple ICD discharges associated with lead fracture without triggering of high impedance alert. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Apr; 32(4):543-6.
Score: 0.025
-
Timing of delayed perforation with the St. Jude Riata lead: a single-center experience and a review of the literature. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Dec; 5(12):1667-72.
Score: 0.024
-
Atrial tachycardia after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: identification of the critical isthmus with a combination of multielectrode activation mapping and targeted entrainment mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008 Apr; 1(1):14-22.
Score: 0.024
-
Catheter ablation of peri-AV nodal atrial tachycardia from the noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar; 19(3):231-7.
Score: 0.023
-
Remote magnetic navigation to guide endocardial and epicardial catheter mapping of scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2007 Mar 13; 115(10):1191-200.
Score: 0.022
-
Factors affecting error in integration of electroanatomic mapping with CT and MR imaging during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct; 17(1):21-7.
Score: 0.022
-
Increased incidence of subacute lead perforation noted with one implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Apr; 4(4):439-42.
Score: 0.022
-
Depression as a predictor for appropriate shocks among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the Triggers of Ventricular Arrhythmias (TOVA) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 05; 45(7):1090-5.
Score: 0.019
-
Catheter ablation of atrial flutter after orthotopic heart transplantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Dec; 15(12):1366-70.
Score: 0.019
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.