Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Ali Shahbaz Raja, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Ali Raja and Ivan Ip.
Connection Strength

2.769
  1. Use of Imaging in the Emergency Department: Do Individual Physicians Contribute to Variation? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 09; 213(3):637-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  2. Impact of a Health Information Technology-Enabled Appropriate Use Criterion on Utilization of Emergency Department CT for Renal Colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 01; 212(1):142-145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  3. Will publishing evidence-based guidelines for low back pain imaging decrease imaging use? Am J Emerg Med. 2019 03; 37(3):545-546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  4. JOURNAL CLUB: Predictors of Provider Response to Clinical Decision Support: Lessons Learned From the Medicare Imaging Demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb; 208(2):351-357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  5. Effects of Performance Feedback Reports on Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines in Use of CT for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov; 205(5):936-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  6. Use of Public Data to Target Variation in Providers' Use of CT and MR Imaging among Medicare Beneficiaries. Radiology. 2015 Jun; 275(3):718-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  7. Impact of clinical decision support on head computed tomography use in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):320-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  8. Radiology utilization in the emergency department: trends of the past 2 decades. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):355-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  9. The reply. Am J Med. 2014 May; 127(5):e23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  10. The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure. Acad Radiol. 2014 Mar; 21(3):378-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  11. Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain. Am J Med. 2014 Jun; 127(6):512-8.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  12. Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology. 2012 Feb; 262(2):468-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  13. Can emergency department provider notes help to achieve more dynamic clinical decision support? J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Dec; 1(6):1269-1277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  14. Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, Clinical Quality Language, and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms in Representing Clinical Evidence Logic Statements for the Use of Imaging Procedures: Descriptive Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 13; 7(2):e13590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Can Automated Retrieval of Data from Emergency Department Physician Notes Enhance the Imaging Order Entry Process? Appl Clin Inform. 2019 03; 10(2):189-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  16. Effect of Clinical Decision Support-Generated Report Cards Versus Real-Time Alerts on Primary Care Provider Guideline Adherence for Low Back Pain Outpatient Lumbar Spine MRI Orders. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 02; 212(2):386-394.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  17. Characteristics of knowledge content in a curated online evidence library. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):507-514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. Clinical decision support increases diagnostic yield of computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr; 36(4):540-544.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  19. Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Radiography for Acute Ankle Injuries: A Randomized Trial. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 18(3):487-495.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  20. Medicare Imaging Demonstration: Assessing Attributes of Appropriate Use Criteria and Their Influence on Ordering Behavior. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May; 208(5):1051-1057.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  21. Evaluating Terminologies to Enable Imaging-Related Decision Rule Sharing. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2016; 2016:2082-2089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  22. Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Department When Providers Override Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support. Radiology. 2017 03; 282(3):717-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  23. Assessing Strength of Evidence of Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Imaging Examinations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 05; 23(3):649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  24. Impact of a clinical decision support tool on adherence to the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar; 34(3):412-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  25. Effect of Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support on the Use and Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiographic Imaging in Hospitalized Patients. Radiology. 2015 Jul; 276(1):167-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  26. Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Feb; 40(2):272-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  27. Journal club: Requiring clinical justification to override repeat imaging decision support: impact on CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov; 203(5):W482-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  28. Assessing 2 D-dimer age-adjustment strategies to optimize computed tomographic use in ED evaluation of pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec; 32(12):1499-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  29. Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e347-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  30. Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram? Am J Med. 2013 Nov; 126(11):975-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.