Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Dushyant V. Sahani, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Dushyant Sahani and Peter Hahn.
Connection Strength

5.637
  1. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: multi-detector row CT with 2D curved reformations--correlation with MRCP. Radiology. 2006 Feb; 238(2):560-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.325
  2. Cystic pancreatic lesions: a simple imaging-based classification system for guiding management. Radiographics. 2005 Nov-Dec; 25(6):1471-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  3. Imaging of rectal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003 Oct; 13(4):389-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.276
  4. Liver lesion detection and characterization with sequential use of hepatobiliary contrast agent mangafodipir trisodium and gadolinium-DTPA in a single imaging protocol. Acad Radiol. 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2:S460-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  5. Dynamic T1-weighted ferumoxides enhanced MRI for imaging liver hemangiomas: preliminary observations. Abdom Imaging. 2001 Mar-Apr; 26(2):166-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  6. Experience With Iterative Reconstruction Techniques for Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in Morbidly and Super Obese Patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Jan/Feb; 42(1):124-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  7. Impact of low-energy CT imaging on selection of positive oral contrast media concentration. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 05; 42(5):1298-1309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  8. Material Separation Using Dual-Energy CT: Current and Emerging Applications. Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug; 36(4):1087-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  9. Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Abdominopelvic CT: Technical Concepts and Clinical Implementation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W19-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  10. Oncologic applications of dual-energy CT in the abdomen. Radiographics. 2014 May-Jun; 34(3):589-612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  11. Dose-modified 256-MDCT of the abdomen using low tube current and hybrid iterative reconstruction. Acad Radiol. 2013 Nov; 20(11):1405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  12. Qualitative assessment of enhancement in a renal mass: contribution of subtraction CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug; 36(4):381-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  13. Assessing renal parenchymal volume on unenhanced CT as a marker for predicting renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jun; 19(6):654-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  14. Protocol modifications for CT perfusion (CTp) examinations of abdomen-pelvic tumors: impact on radiation dose and data processing time. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun; 21(6):1293-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  15. Success of image-guided biopsy for small (= 3 cm) focal liver lesions in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic individuals. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Oct; 21(10):1539-47; quiz 1547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  16. Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn's disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul; 195(1):78-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  17. Differentiation of malignant thrombus from bland thrombus of the portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: application of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2010 Jan; 254(1):154-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  18. Biliary infections: spectrum of imaging findings and management. Radiographics. 2009 Nov; 29(7):2059-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  19. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics. 2009 Oct; 29(6):1725-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  20. Comparative performance of MDCT and MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography in characterizing small pancreatic cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep; 193(3):722-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  21. Imaging-based quantification of hepatic fat: methods and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct; 29(5):1253-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  22. Predictive value of multi-detector computed tomography for accurate diagnosis of serous cystadenoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun 14; 15(22):2739-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  23. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun; 33(3):363-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  24. Cholangiocarcinoma: current and novel imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2008 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1263-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  25. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology. 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  26. Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: implications for liver surgery. Radiographics. 2008 Mar-Apr; 28(2):359-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  27. Small bowel obstruction: the value of coronal reformatted images from 16-multidetector computed tomography--a clinicoradiological perspective. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jan-Feb; 32(1):23-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  28. Value of automated coronal reformations from 64-section multidetector row computerized tomography in the diagnosis of urinary stone disease. J Urol. 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):907-11; discussion 911.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  29. Enhancing and expansile portal vein thrombosis: value in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with multiple hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May; 188(5):1320-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  30. Evaluation of renal transplant donors with 16-section multidetector CT angiography: comparison of contrast media with low and high iodine concentrations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 May; 18(5):603-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  31. 16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan; 188(1):115-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  32. Pancreatic cysts 3 cm or smaller: how aggressive should treatment be? Radiology. 2006 Mar; 238(3):912-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  33. Detection of liver metastases from adenocarcinoma of the colon and pancreas: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced liver MRI and whole-body FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jul; 185(1):239-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  34. Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. Radiology. 2005 Mar; 234(3):785-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  35. Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography for planning intra-arterial chemotherapy pump placement in patients with colorectal metastases to the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jul-Aug; 28(4):478-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  36. Evaluation of simethicone-coated cellulose as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal CT. Acad Radiol. 2003 May; 10(5):491-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  37. Thorotrast-induced cholangiocarcinoma: case report. Abdom Imaging. 2003 Jan-Feb; 28(1):72-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  38. Evaluation of simethicone coated cellulose (SonoRx) as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2:S357-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  39. Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul; 179(1):53-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  40. Characterizing liver hemangiomas on ferumoxides-enhanced dynamic TI-weighted imaging: preliminary experience. Acad Radiol. 2002 May; 9 Suppl 1:S255-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  41. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver with mangafodipir trisodium: imaging technique and results. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Mar-Apr; 26(2):216-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  42. Virtual Unenhanced Images: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison Between Different Dual-Energy CT Scanners in a Patient and Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2022 01 01; 57(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  43. Functioning acinar cell pancreatic carcinoma: diagnosis on mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP)-enhanced MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jan-Feb; 26(1):126-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  44. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 04; 42(4):1141-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  45. Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study. Radiology. 2013 Dec; 269(3):857-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  46. Imaging-guided biopsy of (18)F-FDG-avid extrapulmonary lesions: do lesion location and morphologic features on CT affect the positive predictive value for malignancy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug; 201(2):433-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  47. MR imaging of the gallbladder: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2008 Jan-Feb; 28(1):135-55; quiz 324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  48. Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb; 188(2):433-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  49. Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Sep-Oct; 30(5):818-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  50. Characterization of small liver lesions: Added role of MR after MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Jul-Aug; 30(4):591-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  51. Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports. Radiology. 2006 Aug; 240(2):435-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  52. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 May-Jun; 30(3):391-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  53. Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses: multi-detector row CT protocol with 10-minute delay. Radiology. 2006 Feb; 238(2):578-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  54. Detection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal cancer: comparision of high resolution MnDPDP enhanced MRI and FDG-PET. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12 Suppl 1:S17-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  55. Pheochromocytoma: an imaging chameleon. Radiographics. 2004 Oct; 24 Suppl 1:S87-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  56. The inaccessible or undrainable abscess: how to drain it. Radiographics. 2004 May-Jun; 24(3):717-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  57. Haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome: ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings in the liver. Australas Radiol. 2004 Mar; 48(1):64-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  58. Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology. 2003 Jul; 228(1):251-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  59. Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 May-Jun; 27(3):380-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  60. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Abdom Imaging. 2003 May-Jun; 28(3):357-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  61. Dual contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver with superparamagnetic iron oxide followed by gadolinium for lesion detection and characterization. Clin Radiol. 2001 May; 56(5):410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.