Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows. Harvard Catalyst Profiles
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

connectionStuart Roger Lipsitz, Sc.D.

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Stuart Lipsitz and Troyen Brennan.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.438
 
  1. Thomas EJ, Lipsitz SR, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 04; 136(11):812-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  2. Troxel AB, Lipsitz SR, Brennan TA. Weighted estimating equations with nonignorably missing response data. Biometrics. 1997 Sep; 53(3):857-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  3. Hyams AL, Brandenburg JA, Lipsitz SR, Shapiro DW, Brennan TA. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 15; 122(6):450-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  4. Burstin HR, Johnson WG, Lipsitz SR, Brennan TA. Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status. JAMA. 1993 Oct 13; 270(14):1697-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Burstin HR, Lipsitz SR, Udvarhelyi IS, Brennan TA. The effect of hospital financial characteristics on quality of care. JAMA. 1993 Aug 18; 270(7):845-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. Burstin HR, Lipsitz SR, Brennan TA. Socioeconomic status and risk for substandard medical care. JAMA. 1992 Nov 04; 268(17):2383-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  7. Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Laird NM, Lipsitz S, Hebert L, Brennan TA. Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992; 17(3):463-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  8. Brennan TA, Hebert LE, Laird NM, Lawthers A, Thorpe KE, Leape LL, Localio AR, Lipsitz SR, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. JAMA. 1991 Jun 26; 265(24):3265-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.