Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Catherine S Giess, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Catherine Giess and Sona Chikarmane.
Connection Strength

10.038
  1. Lesion conspicuity on synthetic screening mammography compared to full field digital screening mammography. Clin Imaging. 2021 Jul; 75:90-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.943
  2. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 09; 217(3):587-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.922
  3. Accuracy of MRI-directed ultrasound and subsequent ultrasound-guided biopsy for suspicious breast MRI findings. Clin Radiol. 2020 03; 75(3):185-193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.870
  4. Conspicuity of Screen-Detected Malignancies on Full Field Digital Mammography vs. Synthetic Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2020 06; 27(6):757-763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.848
  5. Screening breast MRI in patients with history of atypia or lobular neoplasia. Breast J. 2019 05; 25(3):484-487.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.833
  6. Ultrasound Features of Mammographic Developing Asymmetries and Correlation With Histopathologic Findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan; 210(1):W29-W38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  7. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  8. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication. Acad Radiol. 2017 04; 24(4):435-441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.709
  9. Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management. Radiology. 2016 09; 280(3):707-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.678
  10. Impact of Electronic Procedural Protocoling on the Timeliness of Pre-operative Breast Localization Procedures. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Sep 07.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  11. Patients characteristics related to screening mammography cancellation and rescheduling rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec; 80:205-210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  12. Electronic Worklist Improves Timeliness of Screening Mammogram Interpretation in an Urban Underserved Population. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Jun 23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  13. Lobular neoplasia detected at MRI-guided biopsy: imaging findings and outcomes. Clin Imaging. 2021 Oct; 78:171-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  14. Nonmass Findings at Breast US: Definition, Classifications, and Differential Diagnosis. Radiographics. 2020 Mar-Apr; 40(2):326-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  15. Impact of an Information Technology-Enabled Quality Improvement Initiative on Timeliness of Patient Contact and Scheduling of Screening Mammography Recall. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 10; 213(4):880-885.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  16. Do benign-concordant breast MRI biopsy results require short interval follow-up imaging? Report of longitudinal study and review of the literature. Clin Imaging. 2019 Sep - Oct; 57:50-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  17. Variability in the Use of Simulation for Procedural Training in Radiology Residency: Opportunities for Improvement. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 May - Jun; 48(3):241-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  18. Strengths and Weaknesses of Synthetic Mammography in Screening. Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec; 37(7):1913-1927.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  19. Troubleshooting to Overcome Technical Challenges in Image-guided Breast Biopsy. Radiographics. 2017 May-Jun; 37(3):705-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  20. Clinical Utility of Breast MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignancy After Inconclusive or Equivocal Mammographic Diagnostic Evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun; 208(6):1378-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  21. Breast MR Imaging for Equivocal Mammographic Findings: Help or Hindrance? Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug; 36(4):943-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  22. Screening Breast MRI in Patients Previously Treated for Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Yield for Cancer and Abnormal Interpretation Rate. Acad Radiol. 2015 Nov; 22(11):1331-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  23. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 12; 46(6):1748-1759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.