Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Login and Edit functionaility are currrently unavailable.

John J. Rosowski, Ph.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications John Rosowski has written about Cochlea.
Connection Strength

3.931
  1. Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear. Hear Res. 2018 03; 360:3-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  2. Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:144-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.417
  3. Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):2852-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  4. Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear. Hear Res. 2012 Nov; 293(1-2):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  5. Middle ear function and cochlear input impedance in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar; 127(3):1397-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.275
  6. Middle-ear pressure gain and cochlear partition differential pressure in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  7. Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Apr; 29(3):282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  8. Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):932-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  9. Effect of freezing and thawing on stapes-cochlear input impedance in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):215-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  10. A lumped-element model of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 04; 145(4):1975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  11. Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2018 09; 367:17-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  12. Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 05; 141(5):3274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  13. Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2754-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  14. Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):30-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  15. Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures. Audiol Neurootol. 2015; 20(1):62-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  16. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:105-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  17. A superior semicircular canal dehiscence-induced air-bone gap in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 Oct 01; 269(1-2):70-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  18. Mice lacking adrenergic signaling have normal cochlear responses and normal resistance to acoustic injury but enhanced susceptibility to middle-ear infection. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep; 11(3):449-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  19. Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):114-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  20. Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Dec; 192(12):1287-311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  21. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard. Hear Res. 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  22. Bone-conduction hyperacusis induced by superior canal dehiscence in human: the underlying mechanism. Sci Rep. 2020 10 06; 10(1):16564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  23. Analysis of middle ear mechanics and application to diseased and reconstructed ears. Am J Otol. 1997 Mar; 18(2):139-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  24. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep; 100(3):1602-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  25. Middle ear mechanics of type IV and type V tympanoplasty: I. Model analysis and predictions. Am J Otol. 1995 Sep; 16(5):555-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  26. Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb; 28(2):250-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 2000 03; 141(1-2):97-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.