Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Login and Edit functionaility are currrently unavailable.

John J. Rosowski, Ph.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications John Rosowski has written about Animals.
Connection Strength

0.446
  1. Limitations of present models of blast-induced sound power conduction through the external and middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 11; 146(5):3978.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  2. A lumped-element model of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 04; 145(4):1975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  3. MEMRO 2018 - Middle ear mechanics - Technology and Otosurgery. Hear Res. 2019 07; 378:1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  4. Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear. Hear Res. 2018 03; 360:3-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  5. Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 05; 141(5):3274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. Identification of induced and naturally occurring conductive hearing loss in mice using bone conduction. Hear Res. 2017 03; 346:45-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  7. Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:144-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  8. Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):2852-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  9. Inner-ear sound pressures near the base of the cochlea in chinchilla: further investigation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr; 133(4):2208-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  10. Measurements of three-dimensional shape and sound-induced motion of the chinchilla tympanic membrane. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:44-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  11. Evidence of inner ear contribution in bone conduction in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:66-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct; 132(4):2437-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear. Hear Res. 2012 Nov; 293(1-2):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. A superior semicircular canal dehiscence-induced air-bone gap in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 Oct 01; 269(1-2):70-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. Middle ear function and cochlear input impedance in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar; 127(3):1397-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. Middle-ear pressure gain and cochlear partition differential pressure in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. Measurement of conductive hearing loss in mice. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):93-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  18. Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4-25 kHz. Hear Res. 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):83-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Mar; 10(1):23-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul; 124(1):363-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Apr; 29(3):282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct; 122(4):2154-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):932-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):943-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Dec; 192(12):1287-311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  26. The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):258-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):53-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms. Otol Neurotol. 2004 May; 25(3):323-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  29. The aging of the middle ear in 129S6/SvEvTac and CBA/CaJ mice: measurements of umbo velocity, hearing function, and the incidence of pathology. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Sep; 4(3):371-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. The effect of immobilizing the gerbil's pars flaccida on the middle-ear's response to static pressure. Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):183-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  31. Effects of middle-ear static pressure on pars tensa and pars flaccida of gerbil ears. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):146-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. Measurements of middle-ear function in the Mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear. Audiol Neurootol. 1999 May-Aug; 4(3-4):129-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  33. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus: III. Effect of variations in middle-ear volume. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Apr; 101(4):2135-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  34. Effects of pars flaccida on sound conduction in ears of Mongolian gerbil: acoustic and anatomical measurements. Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):39-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  35. Treatment of otitis media by transtympanic delivery of antibiotics. Sci Transl Med. 2016 09 14; 8(356):356ra120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  36. Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Oct; 96(4):2184-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  37. Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles. Hear Res. 2013 Oct; 304:49-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  38. Formulations for trans-tympanic antibiotic delivery. Biomaterials. 2013 Jan; 34(4):1281-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  39. Holographic otoscope for nanodisplacement measurements of surfaces under dynamic excitation. Scanning. 2011 Sep-Oct; 33(5):342-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  40. The effects of external- and middle-ear filtering on auditory threshold and noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul; 90(1):124-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  41. Mice lacking adrenergic signaling have normal cochlear responses and normal resistance to acoustic injury but enhanced susceptibility to middle-ear infection. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep; 11(3):449-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  42. Cadaver middle ears as models for living ears: comparisons of middle ear input immittance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990 May; 99(5 Pt 1):403-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  43. Optoelectronic holographic otoscope for measurement of nano-displacements in tympanic membranes. J Biomed Opt. 2009 May-Jun; 14(3):034023.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  44. Measurements of stapes velocity in live human ears. Hear Res. 2009 Mar; 249(1-2):54-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  45. The radiation impedance of the external ear of cat: measurements and applications. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Nov; 84(5):1695-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  46. Active control of ultrasonic hearing in frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 05; 105(31):11014-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  47. A model for signal transmission in an ear having hair cells with free-standing stereocilia. II. Macromechanical stage. Hear Res. 1985; 20(2):139-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  48. A model for signal transmission in an ear having hair cells with free-standing stereocilia. I. Empirical basis for model structure. Hear Res. 1985; 20(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  49. Acoustic input-admittance of the alligator-lizard ear: nonlinear features. Hear Res. 1984 Dec; 16(3):205-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  50. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard. Hear Res. 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  51. Mammalian ear specializations in arid habitats: structural and functional evidence from sand cat (Felis margarita). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Oct; 188(9):663-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  52. A noninvasive method for estimating acoustic admittance at the tympanic membrane. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1128-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  53. Tests of some common assumptions of ear-canal acoustics in cats. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1147-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  54. Relating middle-ear acoustic performance to body size in the cat family: measurements and models. J Comp Physiol A. 2000 May; 186(5):447-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  55. Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 2000 03; 141(1-2):97-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  56. The middle ear of a lion: comparison of structure and function to domestic cat. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar; 101(3):1532-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  57. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep; 100(3):1602-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  58. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 May; 99(5):3044-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  59. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. I: Middle-ear input impedance. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jul; 92(1):157-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  60. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res. 1992 Jan; 57(2):245-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  61. Changes in middle-ear input admittance during postnatal auditory development in chicks. Hear Res. 1986; 24(3):227-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  62. Relationship of transient electrical properties to active sodium transport by toad urinary bladder. J Membr Biol. 1980 Jan 31; 52(1):25-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  63. Middle ear gas exchange in isobaric counterdiffusion. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Dec; 47(6):1239-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.