Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Login and Edit functionaility are currrently unavailable.

John J. Rosowski, Ph.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications John Rosowski has written about Acoustic Stimulation.
Connection Strength

3.597
  1. Response of the human tympanic membrane to transient acoustic and mechanical stimuli: Preliminary results. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:15-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.460
  2. A lumped-element model of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 04; 145(4):1975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  3. Tympanic membrane surface motions in forward and reverse middle ear transmissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 01; 145(1):272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  4. Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear. Hear Res. 2018 03; 360:3-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  5. Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 05; 141(5):3274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  6. Identification of induced and naturally occurring conductive hearing loss in mice using bone conduction. Hear Res. 2017 03; 346:45-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  7. Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:144-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  8. In-plane and out-of-plane motions of the human tympanic membrane. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan; 139(1):104-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  9. Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec; 136(6):3132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  10. Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):2852-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  11. Inner-ear sound pressures near the base of the cochlea in chinchilla: further investigation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr; 133(4):2208-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  12. Measurements of three-dimensional shape and sound-induced motion of the chinchilla tympanic membrane. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:44-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  13. Evidence of inner ear contribution in bone conduction in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:66-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  14. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 2013 Jul; 301:105-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  15. Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct; 132(4):2437-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  16. Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear. Hear Res. 2012 Nov; 293(1-2):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  17. Comparison of umbo velocity in air- and bone-conduction. Hear Res. 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):83-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  18. New data on the motion of the normal and reconstructed tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec; 32(9):1559-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  19. A superior semicircular canal dehiscence-induced air-bone gap in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 Oct 01; 269(1-2):70-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  20. Middle ear function and cochlear input impedance in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar; 127(3):1397-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  21. Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):66-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  22. Middle ear mechanics of cartilage tympanoplasty evaluated by laser holography and vibrometry. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec; 30(8):1209-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  23. Middle-ear pressure gain and cochlear partition differential pressure in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  24. Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):114-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  25. Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography. Hear Res. 2010 May; 263(1-2):78-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  26. Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4-25 kHz. Hear Res. 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):83-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  27. Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct; 122(4):2154-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  28. Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Dec; 192(12):1287-311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  29. The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla. Hear Res. 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):53-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  30. A normative study of tympanic membrane motion in humans using a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). Hear Res. 2004 Jan; 187(1-2):85-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  31. Effects of middle-ear static pressure on pars tensa and pars flaccida of gerbil ears. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):146-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  32. Effect of Middle-Ear Pathology on High-Frequency Ear Canal Reflectance Measurements in the Frequency and Time Domains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 12; 20(6):529-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  33. Measurements of middle-ear function in the Mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear. Audiol Neurootol. 1999 May-Aug; 4(3-4):129-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  34. Combined high-speed holographic shape and full-field displacement measurements of tympanic membrane. J Biomed Opt. 2018 09; 24(3):1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  35. Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones. Hear Res. 2018 09; 367:17-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  36. Effects of pars flaccida on sound conduction in ears of Mongolian gerbil: acoustic and anatomical measurements. Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):39-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  37. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep; 100(3):1602-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  38. Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones. Hear Res. 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):30-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  39. Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts. Hear Res. 2016 10; 340:191-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  40. Viscoelastic properties of the human tympanic membrane studied with stroboscopic holography and finite element modeling. Hear Res. 2014 Jun; 312:69-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  41. Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles. Hear Res. 2013 Oct; 304:49-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  42. Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb; 133(2):918-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. Evaluation of round window stimulation using the floating mass transducer by intracochlear sound pressure measurements in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Apr; 31(3):506-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  44. Measurements of stapes velocity in live human ears. Hear Res. 2009 Mar; 249(1-2):54-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  45. Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: Experimental assessment of the "acoustic route" with perforated tympanic membranes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct; 122(4):2135-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  46. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard. Hear Res. 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  47. Mammalian ear specializations in arid habitats: structural and functional evidence from sand cat (Felis margarita). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Oct; 188(9):663-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  48. Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1432-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  49. Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res. 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):43-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  50. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones. Ear Hear. 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  51. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res. 1992 Jan; 57(2):245-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.