Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Ona Wu, Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Ona Wu and Mark Etherton.
Connection Strength

4.026
  1. Neuroimaging Paradigms to Identify Patients for Reperfusion Therapy in Stroke of Unknown Onset. Front Neurol. 2018; 9:327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.761
  2. Infarct topography and functional outcomes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 09; 38(9):1517-1532.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  3. Global white matter structural integrity mediates the effect of age on ischemic stroke outcomes. Int J Stroke. 2021 Nov 03; 17474930211055906.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  4. White Matter Hyperintensity Burden Is Associated With Hippocampal Subfield Volume in Stroke. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:588883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  5. Normal-appearing white matter microstructural injury is associated with white matter hyperintensity burden in acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2021 02; 16(2):184-191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  6. Sex-specific differences in white matter microvascular integrity after ischaemic stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Dec; 4(4):198-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  7. Big Data Approaches to Phenotyping Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Automated Lesion Segmentation of Multi-Center Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data. Stroke. 2019 07; 50(7):1734-1741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  8. White Matter Integrity and Early Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2019 12; 10(6):630-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  9. Structural Integrity of Normal Appearing White Matter and Sex-Specific Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2017 12; 48(12):3387-3389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  10. Diffuse microvascular dysfunction and loss of white matter integrity predict poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 01; 38(1):75-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  11. Integrity of normal-appearing white matter and functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2017 May 02; 88(18):1701-1708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  12. Recent Advances in Leukoaraiosis: White Matter Structural Integrity and Functional Outcomes after Acute Ischemic Stroke. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 12; 18(12):123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  13. Sex-specific lesion pattern of functional outcomes after stroke. Brain Commun. 2022; 4(2):fcac020.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  14. Excessive White Matter Hyperintensity Increases Susceptibility to Poor Functional Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front Neurol. 2021; 12:700616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  15. MRI Radiomic Signature of White Matter Hyperintensities Is Associated With Clinical Phenotypes. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:691244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  16. Outcome after acute ischemic stroke is linked to sex-specific lesion patterns. Nat Commun. 2021 06 02; 12(1):3289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  17. Abnormal dynamic functional connectivity is linked to recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 05; 42(7):2278-2291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  18. Brain Volume: An Important Determinant of Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 05; 95(5):955-965.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  19. Multi-atlas image registration of clinical data with automated quality assessment using ventricle segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2020 07; 63:101698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  20. Brain Connectivity Measures Improve Modeling of Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2019 10; 50(10):2761-2767.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  21. Rich-Club Organization: An Important Determinant of Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:956.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  22. Spatial Signature of White Matter Hyperintensities in Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.