Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Harald Paganetti, Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Harald Paganetti and Drosoula Giantsoudi.
Connection Strength

9.650
  1. Relative Biological Effectiveness Uncertainties and Implications for Beam Arrangements and Dose Constraints in Proton Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 06; 28(3):256-263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  2. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy? Acta Oncol. 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.759
  3. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction. Phys Med Biol. 2017 04 21; 62(8):R49-R80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.702
  4. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 02 01; 97(2):401-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.680
  5. SU-F-T-206: Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for LET and Dose/Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.664
  6. TU-EF-304-12: Proton Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: LET and RBE Considerations for Cardiac Toxicity. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3617.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.620
  7. Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Mar 21; 60(6):2257-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.609
  8. SU-E-T-375: Passive Scattering to Pencil-Beam-Scanning Comparison for Medulloblastoma Proton Therapy: LET Distributions and Radiobiological Implications. Med Phys. 2014 Jun; 41(6):311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.578
  9. TH-A-19A-11: Validation of GPU-Based Monte Carlo Code (gPMC) Versus Fully Implemented Monte Carlo Code (TOPAS) for Proton Radiation Therapy: Clinical Cases Study. Med Phys. 2014 Jun; 41(6):535.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.578
  10. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Sep 01; 87(1):216-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.542
  11. TH-A-116-02: Radiobiological Implications of Various Target and Beam Geometry Utilization in Treatment Planning for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2013 Jun; 40(6Part32):529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.540
  12. SU-E-T-495: Monte Carlo Dose Verification of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  13. Brain Necrosis in Adult Patients After Proton Therapy: Is There Evidence for Dependency on Linear Energy Transfer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 01 01; 109(1):109-119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  14. Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 05 01; 98(1):37-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  15. Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 12 01; 96(5):1097-1106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  16. TH-CD-209-06: LET-Based Adjustment of IMPT Plans Using Prioritized Optimization. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  17. Incidence of CNS Injury for a Cohort of 111 Patients Treated With Proton Therapy for Medulloblastoma: LET and RBE Associations for Areas of Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):287-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  18. TU-EF-304-08: LET-Based Inverse Planning for IMPT. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  19. SU-E-T-135: Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  20. Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Aug 01; 92(5):1157-1164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  21. TH-A-19A-02: Expanding TOPAS Towards Biological Modeling. Med Phys. 2014 Jun; 41(6):533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  22. SU-E-T-451: Patient and Site-Specific Assessment of the Value of Routine Monte Carlo Dose Calculation in Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2013 Jun; 40(6Part17):309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  23. A dual-stream deep convolutional network for reducing metal streak artifacts in CT images. Phys Med Biol. 2019 11 26; 64(23):235003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  24. Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients With Posterior Fossa Tumors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Associated Dosimetric Factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 03 01; 100(3):719-729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  25. Recent developments and comprehensive evaluations of a GPU-based Monte Carlo package for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016 10 21; 61(20):7347-7362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  26. MO-FG-CAMPUS-IeP2-05: Feasibility Demonstration of High-Voltage Clinical CT and Impact On X-Ray Penetration Through Metal Objects. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3720-3721.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  27. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):454-464.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  28. SU-E-T-369: Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in CSI of Pediatric Patients. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  29. SU-E-T-673: Recent Developments and Comprehensive Validations of a GPU-Based Proton Monte Carlo Simulation Package, GPMC. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  30. TU-EF-304-05: Anterior Proton Beams for Prostate Treatments Lead to Substantial Elevations in Modeled RBE-Weighted Rectal Dose. Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  31. SU-E-T-464: On the Equivalence of the Quality Correction Factor for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Med Phys. 2014 Jun; 41(6):333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  32. Patterns of failure after proton therapy in medulloblastoma; linear energy transfer distributions and relative biological effectiveness associations for relapses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 01; 88(3):655-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  33. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  34. SU-E-T-552: Maximizing the Biological Effect of Proton Dose Delivered with Scanned Beam. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.