Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

HMS faculty, help us improve the algorithms in Profiles by uploading your CV!

Hanne M. Kooy, Ph.D.


This page shows the publications co-authored by Hanne Kooy and Harald Paganetti.
Connection Strength

  1. Proton radiation in the management of localized cancer. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Mar; 7(2):275-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  2. Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility. Med Phys. 2004 Jul; 31(7):2107-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.282
  3. SU-G-TeP4-04: An Automated Monte Carlo Based QA Framework for Pencil Beam Scanning Treatments. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  4. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):190-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  5. SU-F-BRD-12: When Does Pencil Beam Scanning Become Superior to Passive Scattered Proton Therapy for Pediatric Head and Neck Cancers? Med Phys. 2015 Jun; 42(6):3528.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  6. MO-F-213AB-03: Potential Reduction in Out-Of-Field Dose in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Through Use of a Patient-Specific Aperture. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  7. Monte Carlo study of the potential reduction in out-of-field dose using a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2012 May 21; 57(10):2829-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  8. Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Feb; 86(2):148-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  9. The prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak fields in clinical practice. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 21; 50(24):5847-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  10. DICOM-RT Ion interface to utilize MC simulations in routine clinical workflow for proton pencil beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2020 06; 74:1-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  11. National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 05 01; 101(1):152-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients With Posterior Fossa Tumors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Associated Dosimetric Factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 03 01; 100(3):719-729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. Characterization of proton pencil beam scanning and passive beam using a high spatial resolution solid-state microdosimeter. Med Phys. 2017 Nov; 44(11):6085-6095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  14. Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 05 01; 98(1):37-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  15. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and out-of-field cell survival responses to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton beam deliveries. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Oct 21; 57(20):6671-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):311-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.