Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Hanne M. Kooy, Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Hanne Kooy and Nicolas Depauw.
Connection Strength

2.695
  1. MRI-based IMPT planning for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2020 03; 144:79-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.844
  2. Implementation of apertures in a proton pencil-beam dose algorithm. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 Feb 25; 8(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  3. Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2019 04 23; 64(9):095001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  4. Impact of spot size variations on dose in scanned proton beam therapy. Phys Med. 2019 Jan; 57:58-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  5. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning. Med Phys. 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  6. Impact of spot charge inaccuracies in IMPT treatments. Med Phys. 2017 Aug; 44(8):3923-3931.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  7. SU-G-TeP4-04: An Automated Monte Carlo Based QA Framework for Pencil Beam Scanning Treatments. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  8. A novel approach to postmastectomy radiation therapy using scanned proton beams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 01; 91(2):427-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  9. Golden beam data for proton pencil-beam scanning. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 07; 57(5):1147-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  10. A case study in proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Feb 01; 76(2):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  11. Characterization of proton pencil beam scanning and passive beam using a high spatial resolution solid-state microdosimeter. Med Phys. 2017 Nov; 44(11):6085-6095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. A Greedy reassignment algorithm for the PBS minimum monitor unit constraint. Phys Med Biol. 2016 06 21; 61(12):4665-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  13. TH-CD-209-01: A Greedy Reassignment Algorithm for the PBS Minimum Monitor Unit Constraint. Med Phys. 2016 Jun; 43(6):3885-3886.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  14. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):190-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  15. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and out-of-field cell survival responses to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton beam deliveries. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Oct 21; 57(20):6671-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  16. MO-F-213AB-03: Potential Reduction in Out-Of-Field Dose in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Through Use of a Patient-Specific Aperture. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. Monte Carlo study of the potential reduction in out-of-field dose using a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2012 May 21; 57(10):2829-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):311-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.