Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows. Harvard Catalyst Profiles
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

connectionJennifer S. Haas, M.D.

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Jennifer Haas and Asaf Bitton.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
1.429
 
  1. Bitton A, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Haas JS. Toward a better understanding of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Apr; 20(4):281-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.792
  2. Haas JS, Barlow WE, Schapira MM, MacLean CD, Klabunde CN, Sprague BL, Beaber EF, Chen JS, Bitton A, Onega T, Harris K, Tosteson ANA. Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr; 32(4):449-457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  3. Haas JS, Sprague BL, Klabunde CN, Tosteson AN, Chen JS, Bitton A, Beaber EF, Onega T, Kim JJ, MacLean CD, Harris K, Yamartino P, Howe K, Pearson L, Feldman S, Brawarsky P, Schapira MM. Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan; 31(1):52-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  4. Onega T, Haas JS, Bitton A, Brackett C, Weiss J, Goodrich M, Harris K, Pyle S, Tosteson AN. Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns. Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jan; 23(1):35-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  5. Schapira MM, Sprague BL, Klabunde CN, Tosteson AN, Bitton A, Chen JS, Beaber EF, Onega T, MacLean CD, Harris K, Howe K, Pearson L, Feldman S, Brawarsky P, Haas JS. Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct; 31(10):1148-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  6. Chen JS, Sprague BL, Klabunde CN, Tosteson AN, Bitton A, Onega T, MacLean CD, Harris K, Schapira MM, Haas JS. Take the money and run? Redemption of a gift card incentive in a clinician survey. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 24; 16:25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.