Co-Author
This page shows the publications co-authored by Bernard Lee and Adam Tobias.
Connection Strength
8.679
-
A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2010; 30(2):85-90.
Score: 0.426
-
Computer-based learning module increases shared decision making in breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar; 17(3):738-43.
Score: 0.426
-
Analysis of Utility Assessment Scores to Objectify the Health Burden Caused by Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2020 May; 28(2):77-82.
Score: 0.219
-
Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr; 143(4):985-991.
Score: 0.202
-
Reconstruction of Mohs Defects Located in the Head and Neck. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr; 30(2):412-417.
Score: 0.201
-
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women With Previous Abdominal Incisions: A Comparison of Complication Rates. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 11; 81(5):560-564.
Score: 0.196
-
Does Hormone Therapy Use Increase Perioperative Complications in Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 06; 141(6):805e-813e.
Score: 0.191
-
Topical nitroglycerin for the treatment of intraoperative microsurgical vasospasm. Microsurgery. 2018 Jul; 38(5):524-529.
Score: 0.186
-
Evaluating the Use of Tissue Oximetry to Decrease Intensive Unit Monitoring for Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jul; 79(1):42-46.
Score: 0.179
-
Medial Row Perforators Are Associated with Higher Rates of Fat Necrosis in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul; 140(1):19-24.
Score: 0.179
-
The accessibility, readability, and quality of online resources for gender affirming surgery. J Surg Res. 2017 09; 217:198-206.
Score: 0.177
-
Umbilical necrosis rates after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2017 07; 215:257-263.
Score: 0.177
-
Preoperative CT-angiography in autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2016 Nov; 36(8):623-627.
Score: 0.165
-
A Novel Free Flap Monitoring System Using Tissue Oximetry with Text Message Alerts. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Jun; 32(5):415-20.
Score: 0.165
-
Does Increased Experience with Tissue Oximetry Monitoring in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Lead to Decreased Flap Loss? The Learning Effect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr; 137(4):1093-1101.
Score: 0.164
-
Mastectomy skin necrosis after microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 Oct; 198(2):530-4.
Score: 0.153
-
Tumescent mastectomy technique in autologous breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 Oct; 198(2):525-9.
Score: 0.153
-
Patient preferences in access to breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 May 15; 195(2):412-7.
Score: 0.152
-
A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep; 71(3):308-15.
Score: 0.137
-
Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2013 Sep; 184(1):665-70.
Score: 0.134
-
Functional MRI to evaluate "sense of self" following perforator flap breast reconstruction. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49883.
Score: 0.130
-
Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Nov; 69(5):516-20.
Score: 0.130
-
Intramuscular perforator dissection with the hydrodissection technique. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Jan; 29(1):45-9.
Score: 0.129
-
The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct; 69(4):389-93.
Score: 0.129
-
Delayed autologous breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy: is there an optimal time? Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jul; 69(1):14-8.
Score: 0.127
-
Analysis of complications and patient satisfaction in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jul; 69(1):19-23.
Score: 0.127
-
Early experience with barbed sutures for abdominal closure in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Eplasty. 2012; 12:e24.
Score: 0.126
-
High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database. Ann Surg. 2012 Mar; 255(3):551-5.
Score: 0.124
-
The lateral chest wall: a separate aesthetic unit in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec; 128(6):626e-634e.
Score: 0.122
-
Evaluation of clinical outcomes and aesthetic results after autologous fat grafting for contour deformities of the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov; 128(5):411e-418e.
Score: 0.121
-
An analysis of delayed breast reconstruction outcomes as recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Mar; 65(3):289-94.
Score: 0.121
-
Immediate microsurgical breast reconstruction and simultaneous sentinel lymph node dissection: issues with node positivity and recipient vessel selection. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011 Sep; 27(7):445-8.
Score: 0.118
-
Bilateral autologous reconstruction from different sites: indications and outcomes after DIEP and SGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun; 127(6):151e-153e.
Score: 0.117
-
Postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous lumpectomy and radiation therapy: analysis of complications and satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May; 66(5):444-51.
Score: 0.117
-
Breast cancer recurrence following postmastectomy reconstruction compared to mastectomy with no reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May; 66(5):466-71.
Score: 0.117
-
Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr; 127(4):1417-1424.
Score: 0.116
-
Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr; 127(4):1428-1436.
Score: 0.116
-
Tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction decreases flap loss and improves rate of flap salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar; 127(3):1080-1085.
Score: 0.115
-
Postoperative Pain Management in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Identification of Patients With Poor Pain Control. Eplasty. 2010 Sep 15; 10.
Score: 0.112
-
Early results using ultrasound-assisted liposuction as a treatment for fat necrosis in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep; 126(3):762-768.
Score: 0.112
-
Effects of vasopressor administration on the outcomes of microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Jul; 65(1):28-31.
Score: 0.110
-
Infectious Complications Leading to Explantation in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With AlloDerm. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 30; 10:e48.
Score: 0.110
-
Pyoderma gangrenosum following bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Sep; 26(7):475-9.
Score: 0.110
-
Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun; 125(6):1585-1595.
Score: 0.110
-
Postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: an analysis of complications and patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 May; 64(5):679-83.
Score: 0.109
-
Sociodemographics, referral patterns, and Internet use for decision-making in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr; 125(4):1087-1094.
Score: 0.108
-
Establishment of perforator flap programs for breast reconstruction: the New England program experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov; 124(5):1410-1418.
Score: 0.105
-
Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb; 208(2):246-54.
Score: 0.100
-
Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Dec; 207(6):865-73.
Score: 0.098
-
The Maylard incision: a low transverse incision variant seen in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Nov; 62(11):e447-52.
Score: 0.098
-
Ultrasound-assisted liposuction as a treatment of fat necrosis after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a case report. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Jun; 60(6):614-7.
Score: 0.095
-
Paradoxical venous Doppler signal: a sentinel sign of early venous congestion. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008 May; 24(4):255-7.
Score: 0.095
-
DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 May; 121(5):1527-1531.
Score: 0.095
-
The rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessel exposure in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Mar; 60(3):241-3.
Score: 0.094
-
Autologous fat grafting: a technique for stabilization of the microvascular pedicle in DIEP flap reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2008; 28(7):495-8.
Score: 0.093
-
A single-cell atlas of human and mouse white adipose tissue. Nature. 2022 Mar; 603(7903):926-933.
Score: 0.062
-
Role of CTA in Women with Abdominal Scars Undergoing DIEP Breast Reconstruction: Review of 1,187 Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 May; 36(4):294-300.
Score: 0.054
-
Referrals of Plastic Surgery Patients to Integrative Medicine Centers: A Review of Resource Utility. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 07; 83(1):3-6.
Score: 0.051
-
Integrative Medicine in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Our Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 04; 82(4):459-468.
Score: 0.051
-
Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Synopsis Using American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program and National Inpatient Sample Databases. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 04; 80(4 Suppl 4):S229-S235.
Score: 0.047
-
Surgical site infection in immediate breast reconstruction: Does chemotherapy timing make a difference? J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun; 117(7):1440-1446.
Score: 0.047
-
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar; 6(3):e1643.
Score: 0.047
-
Prospective, Double-Blind Evaluation of Umbilicoplasty Techniques Using Conventional and Crowdsourcing Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1151-1162.
Score: 0.046
-
Comparison of risk factors and complications in patients by stratified mastectomy weight: An institutional review of 1041 consecutive cases. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec; 116(7):811-818.
Score: 0.045
-
Comparing the Outcomes of Different Agents to Treat Vasospasm at Microsurgical Anastomosis during the Papaverine Shortage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep; 138(3):401e-408e.
Score: 0.042
-
Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Utility Assessment Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr; 3(4):e380.
Score: 0.039
-
Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68.
Score: 0.038
-
Are patients with low body mass index candidates for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction? Microsurgery. 2015 Sep; 35(6):421-7.
Score: 0.038
-
Living with a unilateral mastectomy defect: a utility assessment and outcomes study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Jun; 30(5):313-8.
Score: 0.035
-
Common patterns of reconstruction for Mohs defects in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jan; 25(1):87-92.
Score: 0.035
-
The Boston marathon bombings: the early plastic surgery experience of one Boston hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov; 132(5):1351-1363.
Score: 0.035
-
First-in-human pilot study of a spatial frequency domain oxygenation imaging system. J Biomed Opt. 2011 Aug; 16(8):086015.
Score: 0.030
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.