Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Bernard Travis Lee, M.D.

Co-Author

Back to Details
This page shows the publications co-authored by Bernard Lee and Samuel Lin.
Bernard Lee
Connection Strength
18.113
Samuel Lin
  1. Tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction decreases flap loss and improves rate of flap salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar; 127(3):1080-1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.462
  2. The intrinsic tying platform in microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jun; 123(6):223e-224e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  3. What Is the Potential Impact of Private Equity Acquisitions Regarding Plastic Surgery Practices? Ann Plast Surg. 2022 01 01; 88(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  4. Opioid-sparing Strategies in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov; 9(11):e3932.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  5. A Multidisciplinary Approach and Review of Safety Recommendations for Plastic Surgeons during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are N95 Masks Enough? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 08 01; 148(2):467-474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  6. Assessment of Opioid-Prescribing Practices in Breast Augmentation: Future Directions for Prescribing Guidelines. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 01; 86(1):11-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  7. Beyond the Tip of the Blade: An Investigation of Upper Extremity Machete Injuries in Honduras. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Mar; 37(3):263-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  8. Revisiting the Relationship Between Hospital Case Volume and Outcomes in Abdominally Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 10; 85(4):397-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  9. Outcomes of microvascular bone flaps versus osteocutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2020 Oct; 40(7):731-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  10. Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Reconstructive Breast Surgery: An Analysis of 51,362 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Oct; 36(8):592-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  11. Analysis of Utility Assessment Scores to Objectify the Health Burden Caused by Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2020 May; 28(2):77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  12. Immediate Reconstruction After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Cohort Analysis Through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Outcomes Review. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 02; 84(2):196-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  13. Social Media: Is the Message Reaching the Plastic Surgery Audience? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 09; 144(3):773-781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  14. The Influence of Surgical Specialty on Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May; 7(5):e2248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  15. The impact of major league baseball on the incidence of operative hand and facial trauma at a level 1 trauma center. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May; 46(3):198-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  16. Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr; 143(4):985-991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  17. Reconstruction of Mohs Defects Located in the Head and Neck. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr; 30(2):412-417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  18. A Comparative Multimetric Assessment of English and Spanish Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Materials. J Surg Res. 2019 06; 238:64-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  19. Technological Advances in Lymphatic Surgery: Bringing to Light the Invisible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 01; 143(1):283-293.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  20. Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women With Previous Abdominal Incisions: A Comparison of Complication Rates. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 11; 81(5):560-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  21. Evaluating the Impact of Resident Participation and the July Effect on Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 08; 81(2):156-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  22. Does Hormone Therapy Use Increase Perioperative Complications in Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 06; 141(6):805e-813e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  23. Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: National trends in utilization from 2005 to 2014. Cancer. 2018 07 01; 124(13):2774-2784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  24. Indocyanine Green Angiography Use in Breast Reconstruction: A National Analysis of Outcomes and Cost in 110,320 Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 04; 141(4):825-832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  25. Comparing Head and Facial Computed Tomographic Imaging in Identifying Operative Facial Fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 04; 80(4 Suppl 4):S219-S222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  26. Identifying Sources of Funding That Contribute to Scholastic Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 04; 80(4 Suppl 4):S214-S218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  27. Evaluation of Contralateral and Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Reconstruction Outcomes: Comparing Alloplastic and Autologous Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 04; 80(4 Suppl 4):S144-S149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  28. The Influence of Connective Tissue Disease in Breast Reconstruction: A National Database Analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 04; 80(4 Suppl 4):S182-S188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  29. Surgical site infection in immediate breast reconstruction: Does chemotherapy timing make a difference? J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun; 117(7):1440-1446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  30. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar; 6(3):e1643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  31. Alternative Metrics of Scholarly Output: The Relationship among Altmetric Score, Mendeley Reader Score, Citations, and Downloads in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 03; 141(3):801-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  32. Topical nitroglycerin for the treatment of intraoperative microsurgical vasospasm. Microsurgery. 2018 Jul; 38(5):524-529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  33. Immediate Breast Reconstruction among Patients with Medicare and Private Insurance: A Matched Cohort Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan; 6(1):e1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  34. Prospective, Double-Blind Evaluation of Umbilicoplasty Techniques Using Conventional and Crowdsourcing Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1151-1162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  35. Initial Assessment, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Minor Pediatric Burn Wounds in Four Patients Remotely: A Preliminary Communication. Telemed J E Health. 2018 05; 24(5):379-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  36. Comparison of risk factors and complications in patients by stratified mastectomy weight: An institutional review of 1041 consecutive cases. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec; 116(7):811-818.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  37. Recurrence Rates Over 20 Years in the Treatment of Malignant Melanoma: Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul; 5(7):e1378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  38. Evaluating the Use of Tissue Oximetry to Decrease Intensive Unit Monitoring for Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jul; 79(1):42-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  39. Medial Row Perforators Are Associated with Higher Rates of Fat Necrosis in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul; 140(1):19-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  40. The financial impact and drivers of hospital charges in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospital analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep; 165(2):301-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  41. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 2017 10; 218:108-116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  42. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  43. National and Regional Differences in 32,248 Postmastectomy Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the Updated National Inpatient Survey. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun; 78(6):717-722.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  44. Umbilical necrosis rates after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2017 07; 215:257-263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  45. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and early complication rates among older women: A big data analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun; 115(7):870-877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  46. Differences in the Reporting of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities among Three Large National Databases for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr; 139(4):795-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  47. Comparing the Outcomes of Different Agents to Treat Vasospasm at Microsurgical Anastomosis during the Papaverine Shortage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep; 138(3):401e-408e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  48. Analyzing Regional Differences over a 15-Year Trend of One-Stage versus Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction in 941,191 Postmastectomy Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul; 138(1):1e-14e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  49. Preoperative CT-angiography in autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2016 Nov; 36(8):623-627.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  50. A Novel Free Flap Monitoring System Using Tissue Oximetry with Text Message Alerts. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Jun; 32(5):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  51. Does Increased Experience with Tissue Oximetry Monitoring in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Lead to Decreased Flap Loss? The Learning Effect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr; 137(4):1093-1101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  52. Readability of online patient resources for melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2016 Feb; 26(1):58-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  53. Three-dimensional Printing in Developing Countries. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Jul; 3(7):e443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  54. The New Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Next Accreditation System Milestones Evaluation System: What Is Expected and How Are Plastic Surgery Residency Programs Preparing? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):181-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  55. Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun; 135(6):1573-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  56. Erratum to: Highest Impact Articles in Microsurgery: A Citation Analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 09; 31(7):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  57. Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Utility Assessment Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr; 3(4):e380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  58. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice among Plastic Surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr; 3(4):e381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  59. Use of tragal cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: An anatomic study and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2015 Apr-May; 94(4-5):E44-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  60. Mastectomy skin necrosis after microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 Oct; 198(2):530-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  61. Are patients with low body mass index candidates for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction? Microsurgery. 2015 Sep; 35(6):421-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  62. Tumescent mastectomy technique in autologous breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 Oct; 198(2):525-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  63. Highest Impact Articles in Microsurgery: A Citation Analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Sep; 31(7):527-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  64. Patient preferences in access to breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 May 15; 195(2):412-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  65. Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015; 23(2):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  66. Population preferences of undergoing brachioplasty for arm laxity. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec; 73 Suppl 2:S149-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  67. Patient selection optimization following combined abdominal procedures: analysis of 4925 patients undergoing panniculectomy/abdominoplasty with or without concurrent hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct; 134(4):539e-550e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  68. Properties of meshes used in hernia repair: a comprehensive review of synthetic and biologic meshes. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Feb; 31(2):83-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  69. Vasopressors and reconstructive flap perfusion: a review of the literature comparing the effects of various pharmacologic agents. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Aug; 73(2):245-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  70. Trends in facial fracture treatment using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar; 133(3):627-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  71. Living with a unilateral mastectomy defect: a utility assessment and outcomes study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Jun; 30(5):313-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  72. Effects of statins on ischemia-reperfusion complications in breast free flaps. J Surg Res. 2014 Jul; 190(1):378-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  73. Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 May; 67(5):607-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  74. A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb; 133(2):446-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  75. Common patterns of reconstruction for Mohs defects in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jan; 25(1):87-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  76. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov; 132(5):1057-1066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  77. The Boston marathon bombings: the early plastic surgery experience of one Boston hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov; 132(5):1351-1363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  78. A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep; 71(3):308-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  79. Thigh laxity after massive weight loss: a utilities outcomes assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep; 71(3):304-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  80. Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jun; 70(6):732-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  81. Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2013 Sep; 184(1):665-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  82. Dynamic rehabilitation of facial nerve injury: a review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Jun; 29(5):283-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  83. Static treatment modalities in facial paralysis: a review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 May; 29(4):223-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  84. A jaw-dropping predicament. Eplasty. 2012; 12:ic16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  85. Augmented SIEA flap for microvascular breast reconstruction after prior ligation of bilateral deep inferior epigastric arteries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jun; 66(6):845-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  86. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct; 69(4):389-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  87. Staged scalp soft tissue expansion before delayed allograft cranioplasty: a technical report. Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep; 71(1 Suppl Operative):15-20; discussion 21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  88. Early experience with barbed sutures for abdominal closure in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Eplasty. 2012; 12:e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  89. Accessory breast tissue. Eplasty. 2012; 12:ic5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  90. The lateral chest wall: a separate aesthetic unit in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec; 128(6):626e-634e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  91. Staged Scalp Soft Tissue Expansion Prior to Delayed Allograft Cranioplasty: A Technical Report. Neurosurgery. 2011 Nov 21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  92. Intraoperative CT: A teaching tool for the management of complex facial fracture fixation in surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2011 Sep-Oct; 68(5):437-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  93. Use of intraoperative computed tomography in complex facial fracture reduction and fixation. J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jul; 22(4):1466-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  94. Bilateral autologous reconstruction from different sites: indications and outcomes after DIEP and SGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun; 127(6):151e-153e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  95. The FLARE intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging system: a first-in-human clinical trial in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov; 126(5):1472-1481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  96. Effects of vasopressor administration on the outcomes of microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Jul; 65(1):28-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  97. Pedicled perforator flaps: a new principle in reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan; 125(1):201-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  98. A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2010; 30(2):85-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  99. Computer-based learning module increases shared decision making in breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar; 17(3):738-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  100. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging in perforator flap reconstruction: current research and early clinical experience. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Jan; 26(1):59-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  101. Establishment of perforator flap programs for breast reconstruction: the New England program experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov; 124(5):1410-1418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  102. The posterior tibial artery perforator flap: an alternative to free-flap closure in the comorbid patient. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009 Feb; 25(2):105-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  103. A single-cell atlas of human and mouse white adipose tissue. Nature. 2022 Mar; 603(7903):926-933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  104. #MadelungDeformity: Insights Into a Rare Congenital Difference Using Social Media. Hand (N Y). 2021 Nov 12; 15589447211054133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  105. Truth-in-Advertising Laws: Are They Working? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a "Plastic Surgeon" Patient Search Simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 147(1):231-238.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  106. Role of CTA in Women with Abdominal Scars Undergoing DIEP Breast Reconstruction: Review of 1,187 Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 May; 36(4):294-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  107. The Stacked Hemiabdominal Extended Perforator Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 11; 144(5):923e-924e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  108. Epidemiologic Characteristics and Postoperative Complications following Augmentation Mammaplasty: Comparison of Transgender and Cisgender Females. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Oct; 7(10):e2461.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  109. Masculinizing Chest Reconstruction in Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: An Analysis of Epidemiology, Surgical Technique, and Postoperative Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 12; 43(6):1575-1585.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  110. Referrals of Plastic Surgery Patients to Integrative Medicine Centers: A Review of Resource Utility. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 07; 83(1):3-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  111. Mastectomy in Transgender and Cisgender Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jun; 7(6):e2316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  112. Integrative Medicine in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Our Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 04; 82(4):459-468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  113. Lymphedema Incidence After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Quantifying the Impact of Radiation and the Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 04; 82(4S Suppl 3):S234-S241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  114. A Multimetric Evaluation of Online Spanish Health Resources for Lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 03; 82(3):255-261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  115. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal based perforator free flaps. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep; 116(4):448-449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  116. Oncoplastic breast surgery: Achieving oncological and aesthetic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug; 116(2):195-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  117. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  118. Bipedicle-conjoined perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2015 Aug; 197(2):256-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  119. First-in-human pilot study of a spatial frequency domain oxygenation imaging system. J Biomed Opt. 2011 Aug; 16(8):086015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
© 2022 President and Fellows of Harvard College
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.