Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

William Gerald Austen Jr., M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by William Austen and Amy Colwell.
Connection Strength

3.906
  1. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar; 133(3):496-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.585
  2. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec; 128(6):1170-1178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.501
  3. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Aug; 65(2):140-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.457
  4. Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Permanent Implants or Tissue Expanders: Which is Better? Ann Surg. 2019 Oct 23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  5. Impact of Patient Subtype and Surgical Variables on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A 12-Year Massachusetts General Hospital Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov; 140(5):899-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  6. Thermal Injury to Reconstructed Breasts from Commonly Used Warming Devices: A Risk for Reconstructive Failure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Oct; 4(10):e1033.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  7. Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul; 138(1):24e-30e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  8. Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun; 137(6):1690-1699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  9. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with previous breast surgery: comparative analysis of 775 immediate breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun; 135(6):954e-962e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  10. Breast reconstruction outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Apr; 135(4):959-966.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  11. Comparative analysis of processing methods in fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct; 134(4):675-683.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  12. Abstract 25: breast reconstruction outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  13. Abstract 98: nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with previous breast surgery: comparative analysis of 123 immediate reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar; 133(3 Suppl):112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  14. Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun; 131(6):1223-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  15. Abdominal contouring procedures increase activity of the coagulation cascade. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Aug; 69(2):129-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  16. Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 03; 141(3):541-549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  17. Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Sep; 225(3):361-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  18. Positive Nipple Margins in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies: Rates, Management, and Oncologic Safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 06; 222(6):1149-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  19. Lifetime Costs of Prophylactic Mastectomies and Reconstruction versus Surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec; 136(6):730e-740e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  20. Occult Histopathology and Its Predictors in Contralateral and Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar; 23(3):767-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  21. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Irradiated Breasts: Selecting Patients to Minimize Complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct; 22(10):3331-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  22. Cost and outcome analysis of breast reconstruction paradigm shift. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Aug; 73(2):141-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. Management of positive sub-areolar/nipple duct margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2014 Jul-Aug; 20(4):402-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  24. Abstract 43: Prophylactic Mastectomies: Implications of Occult Histology and Lifetime Cost of Surveillance vs. Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar; 133(3 Suppl):53-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  25. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct; 20(10):3218-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.