Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Daniel Gert Deschler, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Daniel Deschler and Kevin Emerick.
Connection Strength

9.009
  1. Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of complex parotidectomy, lateral skull base, and total auriculectomy defects. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Sep; 140(9):861-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.627
  2. Supraclavicular flap reconstruction following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug; 124(8):1777-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.600
  3. Initial clinical findings of a mathematical model to predict survival of head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Oct; 149(4):572-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.577
  4. Incidence of donor site skin graft loss requiring surgical intervention with the radial forearm free flap. Head Neck. 2007 Jun; 29(6):573-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  5. Clinical presentation, management, and outcome of high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 May; 136(5):783-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  6. The effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on microvenous thrombosis in a rat model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb; 9(1):19-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  7. Common ENT disorders. South Med J. 2006 Oct; 99(10):1090-9; quiz 1100-2, 1126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  8. Programmed cell death ligand-1 and cytotoxic T cell infiltrates in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2020 11; 42(11):3226-3234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  9. Predicting length of stay in head and neck patients who undergo free flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Jun; 5(3):461-467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  10. Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in head and neck patients undergoing free flap reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Mar - Apr; 41(2):102392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  11. Submental Island Flap: A Technical Update. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Dec; 128(12):1177-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  12. Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Parotid: Very Close Margins and Adjuvant Radiotherapy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2019; 81(1):55-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  13. Reconstruction of total parotidectomy defects with a de-epithelialized submental flap. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Apr; 4(2):222-226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  14. Postoperative care in an intermediate-level medical unit after head and neck microvascular free flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb; 4(1):39-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  15. Close Margins and Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 11 01; 144(11):1011-1016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  16. Transfusion in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Pedicled Flap Reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2018 12; 128(12):E409-E415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  17. Sublingual gland excision for the surgical management of plunging ranula. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep - Oct; 39(5):497-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  18. Factors affecting survival and locoregional control in head and neck cSCCA with nodal metastasis. Laryngoscope. 2018 08; 128(8):1881-1886.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  19. Chicken thigh microvascular training model improves resident surgical skills. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 12; 2(6):471-474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  20. Locoregional control of tongue base adenoid cystic carcinoma with primary resection and radial forearm free flap reconstruction. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Jan; 96(1):37-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  21. Perioperative Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk Stratification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 01; 156(1):118-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  22. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap and Fasciocutaneous Free Flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan; 154(1):66-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  23. Transfusion in head and neck free flap patients: practice patterns and a comparative analysis by flap type. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar; 152(3):449-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  24. The time course and microbiology of surgical site infections after head and neck free flap surgery. Laryngoscope. 2015 May; 125(5):1084-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  25. Primary tracheoesophageal puncture with supraclavicular artery island flap after total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Sep; 151(3):421-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  26. Shoulder function following reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap. Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov; 124(11):2478-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  27. Poor Survival for American Indians with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 08; 151(2):265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  28. The supraclavicular artery flap for head and neck reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 16(2):127-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  29. Survival differences among American Indians/Alaska Natives with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2013 Aug; 35(8):1114-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  30. Free flap reconstruction in 1999 and 2009: changing case characteristics and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2012 Oct; 122(10):2160-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  31. Simplified technique of tracheoesophageal prosthesis placement at the time of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP). Laryngoscope. 2011 Sep; 121(9):1855-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  32. Primary TEP placement in patients with laryngopharyngeal free tissue reconstruction and salivary bypass tube placement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Mar; 144(3):474-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  33. Evaluation of voice prosthesis placement at the time of primary tracheoesophageal puncture with total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2009 Jul; 119(7):1353-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  34. Pathology quiz case 1. Adenocarcinoma with features of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and cystadenocarcinoma (CAC). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec; 131(12):1120, 1122-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  35. Prediction of Speech, Swallowing, and Quality of Life in Oral Cavity Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study. Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr 21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  36. Prospective assessment of multiple HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2021 Jun; 117:105212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  37. Risk Factors for Laryngectomy for Dysfunctional Larynx After Organ Preservation Protocols: A Case-Control Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar; 164(3):608-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  38. Outcomes and prognostic factors in parotid gland malignancies: A 10-year single center experience. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Dec; 4(6):632-639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  39. Tracking operative autonomy and performance in otolaryngology training using smartphone technology: A single institution pilot study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Dec; 4(6):578-586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  40. Immunohistochemical quantification of partial-EMT in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma primary tumors is associated with nodal metastasis. Oral Oncol. 2019 12; 99:104458.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  41. Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan - Feb; 41(1):102291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  42. Composite Nasoseptal Flap for Palate Reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct; 30(7):1990-1993.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  43. Association of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Expression With Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 09 01; 111(9):933-942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  44. Assessments of Otolaryngology Resident Operative Experiences Using Mobile Technology: A Pilot Study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 12; 161(6):939-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  45. Supraclavicular flap practice patterns and outcomes: A survey of 221 AHNS surgeons. Laryngoscope. 2019 09; 129(9):2012-2019.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  46. Oncologic and functional outcomes of pretreatment tracheotomy in advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis. Oral Oncol. 2018 03; 78:171-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  47. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Primary and Metastatic Tumor Ecosystems in Head and Neck Cancer. Cell. 2017 Dec 14; 171(7):1611-1624.e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  48. Risk factors for thirty-day readmission following flap reconstruction of oncologic defects of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2018 02; 128(2):343-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  49. Surgical Site Infections in Major Head and Neck Surgeries Involving Pedicled Flap Reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017 Jan; 126(1):20-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  50. Risk factors for surgical site infection after supraclavicular flap reconstruction in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Head Neck. 2016 11; 38(11):1615-1620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  51. Head and neck free flap surgical site infections in the era of the Surgical Care Improvement Project. Head Neck. 2016 04; 38 Suppl 1:E392-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  52. Knowledge and screening of head and neck cancer among American Indians in South Dakota. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun; 105(6):1155-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  53. Surgical salvage of the oropharynx after failure of organ-sparing therapy. Head Neck. 2011 Apr; 33(4):516-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.