Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Jeffrey John Popma, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Jeffrey Popma and Igor Palacios.
Connection Strength

0.289
  1. The Value of Left Ventricular Support in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Extensive Revascularization: An Analysis From the PROTECT-II Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 14; 12(19):1985-1987.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  2. Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 08; 70(6):689-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  3. Percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: Real-world versus clinical trial experience. Am Heart J. 2015 Nov; 170(5):872-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  4. Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial). Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15; 113(2):222-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  5. Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study. Am Heart J. 2014 Apr; 167(4):472-479.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. Optimizing rotational atherectomy in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROTECT ?? study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 01; 83(7):1057-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  7. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012 Oct 02; 126(14):1717-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  8. Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents for the reduction of restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 01; 88(3):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.