Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Hilary Kiyo Finucane, Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Hilary Finucane and Alkes Price.
Connection Strength

5.563
  1. Heritability enrichment of specifically expressed genes identifies disease-relevant tissues and cell types. Nat Genet. 2018 04; 50(4):621-629.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.756
  2. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat Genet. 2015 Nov; 47(11):1228-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.634
  3. Functionally informed fine-mapping and polygenic localization of complex trait heritability. Nat Genet. 2020 12; 52(12):1355-1363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  4. Annotations capturing cell type-specific TF binding explain a large fraction of disease heritability. Hum Mol Genet. 2020 05 08; 29(7):1057-1067.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  5. Genes with High Network Connectivity Are Enriched for Disease Heritability. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 05; 105(6):1302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  6. Author Correction: Linkage disequilibrium-dependent architecture of human complex traits shows action of negative selection. Nat Genet. 2019 Aug; 51(8):1295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  7. Reconciling S-LDSC and LDAK functional enrichment estimates. Nat Genet. 2019 08; 51(8):1202-1204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  8. Genes with High Network Connectivity Are Enriched for Disease Heritability. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 05 02; 104(5):896-913.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  9. Quantification of frequency-dependent genetic architectures in 25 UK Biobank traits reveals action of negative selection. Nat Commun. 2019 02 15; 10(1):790.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  10. Estimating cross-population genetic correlations of causal effect sizes. Genet Epidemiol. 2019 03; 43(2):180-188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  11. Functional architecture of low-frequency variants highlights strength of negative selection across coding and non-coding annotations. Nat Genet. 2018 11; 50(11):1600-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  12. Detecting genome-wide directional effects of transcription factor binding on polygenic disease risk. Nat Genet. 2018 10; 50(10):1483-1493.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  13. Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature. 2018 07; 559(7714):350-355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  14. Leveraging molecular quantitative trait loci to understand the genetic architecture of diseases and complex traits. Nat Genet. 2018 07; 50(7):1041-1047.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  15. Transcriptome-wide association study of schizophrenia and chromatin activity yields mechanistic disease insights. Nat Genet. 2018 04; 50(4):538-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  16. Linkage disequilibrium-dependent architecture of human complex traits shows action of negative selection. Nat Genet. 2017 Oct; 49(10):1421-1427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  17. Functional Architectures of Local and Distal Regulation of Gene Expression in Multiple Human Tissues. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Apr 06; 100(4):605-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  18. Leveraging Distant Relatedness to Quantify Human Mutation and Gene-Conversion Rates. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Dec 03; 97(6):775-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  19. Contrasting genetic architectures of schizophrenia and other complex diseases using fast variance-components analysis. Nat Genet. 2015 Dec; 47(12):1385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  20. Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Oct 01; 97(4):576-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  21. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat Genet. 2015 Mar; 47(3):284-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  22. Estimating heritability and its enrichment in tissue-specific gene sets in admixed populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2021 07 28; 30(16):1521-1534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  23. Genome-wide enhancer maps link risk variants to disease genes. Nature. 2021 05; 593(7858):238-243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  24. Publisher Correction: Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers. Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 23; 10(1):4386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  25. Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers. Nat Commun. 2019 01 25; 10(1):431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  26. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018 06 22; 360(6395).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  27. Quantifying the Genetic Correlation between Multiple Cancer Types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 09; 26(9):1427-1435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  28. Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2017 Jun; 49(6):834-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  29. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017 01 15; 33(2):272-279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  30. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015 Nov; 47(11):1236-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  31. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat Genet. 2015 Nov; 47(11):1294-1303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  32. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2015 Mar; 47(3):291-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  33. Partitioning heritability of regulatory and cell-type-specific variants across 11 common diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Nov 06; 95(5):535-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.