Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Elliott Marshall Antman, M.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Elliott Antman and Christian Ruff.
Connection Strength

7.602
  1. Management of Bleeding With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in the Era of Specific Reversal Agents. Circulation. 2016 Jul 19; 134(3):248-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.671
  2. Association between edoxaban dose, concentration, anti-Factor Xa activity, and outcomes: an analysis of data from the randomised, double-blind ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 06; 385(9984):2288-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.610
  3. Transition of patients from blinded study drug to open-label anticoagulation: the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 12; 64(6):576-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.586
  4. New oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation - Authors'reply. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):25-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.582
  5. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15; 383(9921):955-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.559
  6. Ischemic and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with and without peripheral artery disease and efficacy and safety of full and half-dose Edoxaban vs. Warfarin: insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Dec 28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  7. Clinical Application of a Novel Genetic Risk Score for Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Cardiometabolic Disease. Circulation. 2021 02 02; 143(5):470-478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  8. Pharmacogenetic-guided and clinical warfarin dosing algorithm assessments with bleeding outcomes risk-stratified by genetic and covariate subgroups. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15; 317:159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  9. Correction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12; 73(5):627.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  10. Cardiovascular Biomarker Score and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Subanalysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Dec 01; 1(9):999-1006.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  11. Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk of Falling: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 09 13; 68(11):1169-1178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  12. Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 05 20; 5(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  13. Systemic, noncerebral, arterial embolism in 21,105 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to edoxaban or warfarin: results from the Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study 48 trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Oct; 170(4):669-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  14. Edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on amiodarone: a subgroup analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 01; 36(33):2239-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  15. Edoxaban vs. warfarin in vitamin K antagonist experienced and naive patients with atrial fibrillation†. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 14; 36(23):1470-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  16. Safety and efficacy of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in different regions of the world. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 22; 155(3):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  17. Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). Am Heart J. 2010 Oct; 160(4):635-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  18. TIMI risk index and the benefit of enoxaparin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2007 Nov; 120(11):993-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  19. Edoxaban versus Warfarin in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: A comprehensive analysis of high-risk subgroups. Am Heart J. 2022 May; 247:24-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  20. A Targeted Proteomic Approach Identifies Novel Biomarkers of Arterial Thromboembolic Risk in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 08 10; 78(6):634-636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  21. Reply: Do We Need to Define Therapeutic Ranges for Edoxaban Plasma Concentration? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 06 29; 77(25):3232-3233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  22. Serial assessment of biomarkers and the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2021 05 01; 42(17):1698-1706.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  23. Patients with diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: meta-analysis of eight outcomes in 58 634 patients across four randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 04 09; 7(FI1):f40-f49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  24. Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Half-Dose Versus Full-Dose Edoxaban in 14,014 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 03 09; 77(9):1197-1207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  25. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Edoxaban in 8040 Women Versus 13 065 Men With Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Circulation. 2021 02 16; 143(7):673-684.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  26. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to the risk of stroke: A secondary analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study. Am Heart J. 2021 05; 235:132-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  27. Intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or edoxaban: An in-depth analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized trial. J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr; 86:294-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  28. Cardiovascular- and Bleeding-Related Hospitalization Rates With Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Based on Results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 11; 13(11):e006511.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  29. Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Extremes of Body Weight: An Analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Thromb Haemost. 2021 Feb; 121(2):140-149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  30. Efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin according to the burden of diseases in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 07 01; 6(3):167-175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  31. Efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients with diabetes mellitus in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2020 04 01; 304:185-191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  32. Left atrial structure and function and the risk of death or heart failure in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 12; 21(12):1571-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  33. Comparison of Events Across Bleeding Scales in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Circulation. 2019 11 26; 140(22):1792-1801.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  34. Edoxaban Versus Warfarin Stratified by Average Blood Pressure in 19 679 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Hypertension in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Hypertension. 2019 09; 74(3):597-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  35. Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and History of Liver Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 07 16; 74(2):179-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  36. Clinical outcomes, edoxaban concentration, and anti-factor Xa activity of Asian patients with atrial fibrillation compared with non-Asians in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 05 14; 40(19):1518-1527.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  37. Relationship between body mass index and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with edoxaban or warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 05 14; 40(19):1541-1550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  38. Performance of the ABC Scores for Assessing the Risk of Stroke or Systemic Embolism and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Circulation. 2019 02 05; 139(6):760-771.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  39. Edoxaban and implantable cardiac device interventions: insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Europace. 2019 Feb 01; 21(2):306-312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  40. Linking Endogenous Factor Xa Activity, a Biologically Relevant Pharmacodynamic Marker, to Edoxaban Plasma Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Circulation. 2018 10 30; 138(18):1963-1973.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  41. The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Sep; 8(6):554-561.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  42. Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Latin American Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 09 25; 72(13):1466-1475.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  43. Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients With Active Malignancy and Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 08 21; 7(16):e008987.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  44. Edoxaban in atrial fibrillation patients with established coronary artery disease: Insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Mar; 8(2):176-185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  45. Peri-operative Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin or Edoxaban: Analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Thromb Haemost. 2018 06; 118(6):1001-1008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  46. Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Edoxaban Versus Warfarin: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 05; 11(5):e003998.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  47. Clinical events after interruption of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: An analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2018 04 15; 257:102-107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  48. Impact of Spontaneous Extracranial Bleeding Events on Health State Utility in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 11; 6(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  49. Digoxin Use and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Heart Failure in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 30; 6(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  50. First experience with edoxaban and atrial fibrillation ablation - Insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 01; 244:192-195.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  51. Valvular Heart Disease Patients on Edoxaban or Warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21; 69(11):1372-1382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  52. A novel risk prediction score in atrial fibrillation for a net clinical outcome from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 21; 38(12):888-896.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  53. Edoxaban for the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valves. Circulation. 2017 03 28; 135(13):1273-1275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  54. Stroke and Mortality Risk in Patients With Various Patterns of Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 01; 10(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  55. Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 07 08; 5(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  56. Outcomes With Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Previous Cerebrovascular Events: Findings From ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48). Stroke. 2016 08; 47(8):2075-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  57. Impact of Renal Function on Outcomes With Edoxaban in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Circulation. 2016 Jul 05; 134(1):24-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  58. Efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 09; 18(9):1153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  59. The Prognostic Significance of Cardiac Structure and Function in Atrial Fibrillation: The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Echocardiographic Substudy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 06; 29(6):537-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  60. Mortality in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Randomized to Edoxaban or Warfarin: Insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. Am J Med. 2016 Aug; 129(8):850-857.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  61. Concomitant Use of Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Edoxaban or Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23; 5(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  62. Edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the US Food and Drug Administration approval population: An analysis from the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial. Am Heart J. 2016 Feb; 172:144-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  63. Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation based on results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Dec; 170(6):1140-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  64. Genetics and the clinical response to warfarin and edoxaban: findings from the randomised, double-blind ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 06; 385(9984):2280-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  65. Cerebrovascular events in 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to edoxaban versus warfarin: Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48. Stroke. 2014 Aug; 45(8):2372-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  66. Left atrial structure and function in atrial fibrillation: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 07; 35(22):1457-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  67. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28; 369(22):2093-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  68. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology/World Heart Federation universal definition of myocardial infarction classification system and the risk of cardiovascular death: observations from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38). Circulation. 2012 Jan 31; 125(4):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  69. Effect of the novel thienopyridine prasugrel compared with clopidogrel on spontaneous and procedural myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38: an application of the classification system from the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009 Jun 02; 119(21):2758-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.