Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Hari R Mallidi, M.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications Hari Mallidi has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength

0.304
  1. Impact of concomitant mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation at the time of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 10 01; 25(4):620-623.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  2. Association of Donor and Recipient Telomere Length with Clinical Outcomes following Lung Transplantation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  3. Continuous-flow ventricular assist device exchange is safe and effective in prolonging support time in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan; 149(1):267-75, 278.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  4. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with worse outcomes after both listing and transplanting children with heart failure. Pediatr Transplant. 2013 Sep; 17(6):573-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  5. Transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: improvement in the lung allocation score era. Circulation. 2013 Jun 25; 127(25):2503-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  6. Heart transplant graft survival is improved after a reduction in panel reactive antibody activity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb; 145(2):555-64; discussion 564-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  7. Ventricular assist devices: history, patient selection, and timing of therapy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Jun; 2(2):159-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  8. Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Mar; 127(3):636-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  9. The short-term and long-term effects of warm or tepid cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar; 125(3):711-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  10. Joint preoperative transthoracic and intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation severity provides better association with long-term mortality. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 01 01; 32(1):9-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  11. Left ventricle unloading strategies in ECMO: A single-center experience. J Card Surg. 2020 Jul; 35(7):1514-1524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  12. Outcomes After Tricuspid Valve Repair With Ring Versus Suture Bicuspidization Annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 09; 110(3):821-828.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  13. Clinical Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in the Presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 09; 16(9):1131-1137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  14. Comparison of heart transplant outcomes between recipients with pulsatile- vs continuous-flow LVAD. J Card Surg. 2019 Oct; 34(10):1062-1068.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  15. Recurrence of Pericardial Mesothelioma Affecting the Myocardium After Pericardial Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 11; 106(5):e243-e245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  16. Nonidentical Continuous-Flow Devices For Biventricular Support. Tex Heart Inst J. 2017 Apr; 44(2):141-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  17. Comparison of extracorporeal photopheresis and alemtuzumab for the treatment of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 03; 37(3):340-348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  18. Safety and Feasibility of Open Chest Epicardial Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia During the Period of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan; 27(1):95-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct; 42(5):419-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Aspergillus Mediastinitis after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A Case Report. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct; 42(5):468-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  21. Surgical approach to continuous-flow left ventricular assist device explantation: A comparison of outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan; 151(1):192-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. Ventricular reconditioning and pump explantation in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jun; 34(6):766-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. HeartMate II left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with advanced hepatic dysfunction. J Card Surg. 2014 May; 29(3):419-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Salvage of infected left ventricular assist device with antibiotic beads. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan; 133(1):28e-38e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Endovascular management of pseudoaneurysm formation in the ascending aorta following lung transplantation. J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb; 19(1):52-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. Early outcomes of deliberate nonoperative management for blunt thoracic aortic injury in trauma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 140(3):598-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  27. Determinants of incomplete left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Card Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug; 20(4):307-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  28. Why is off-pump coronary surgery uncommon in Canada? Results of a population-based survey of Canadian heart surgeons. Circulation. 2004 Sep 14; 110(11 Suppl 1):II7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Multiple arterial grafts. Radial versus right internal thoracic arteries. Circulation. 1998 Nov 10; 98(19 Suppl):II7-13; discussion II13-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  30. The technique of radial artery bypass grafting and early clinical results. J Card Surg. 1995 Sep; 10(5):537-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.