Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Kevin Struhl, Ph.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Kevin Struhl and Zarmik Moqtaderi.
Connection Strength

7.013
  1. A compensatory link between cleavage/polyadenylation and mRNA turnover regulates steady-state mRNA levels in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 01 25; 119(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.983
  2. Extensive Structural Differences of Closely Related 3' mRNA Isoforms: Links to Pab1 Binding and mRNA Stability. Mol Cell. 2018 12 06; 72(5):849-861.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.783
  3. Secondary structures involving the poly(A) tail and other 3' sequences are major determinants of mRNA isoform stability in yeast. Microb Cell. 2014 Apr; 1(4):137-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  4. Species-specific factors mediate extensive heterogeneity of mRNA 3' ends in yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 02; 110(27):11073-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.541
  5. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012 Sep 06; 489(7414):57-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.513
  6. Genomic binding profiles of functionally distinct RNA polymerase III transcription complexes in human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 May; 17(5):635-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  7. Expanding the repertoire of plasmids for PCR-mediated epitope tagging in yeast. Yeast. 2008 Apr; 25(4):287-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  8. Defining in vivo targets of nuclear proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2004 Nov; Chapter 21:Unit 21.9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.298
  9. Genome-wide occupancy profile of the RNA polymerase III machinery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals loci with incomplete transcription complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2004 May; 24(10):4118-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  10. The transcriptional elongation rate regulates alternative polyadenylation in yeast. Elife. 2020 08 26; 9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  11. The histone H3-like TAF is broadly required for transcription in yeast. Mol Cell. 1998 Nov; 2(5):675-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  12. The TAFs in the HAT. Cell. 1998 Jul 10; 94(1):1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  13. Activation and repression mechanisms in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1998; 63:413-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  14. TBP-associated factors are not generally required for transcriptional activation in yeast. Nature. 1996 Sep 12; 383(6596):188-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  15. Mapping 3' mRNA isoforms on a genomic scale. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2015 Apr 01; 110:4.23.1-4.23.17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  16. Global analysis of mRNA isoform half-lives reveals stabilizing and destabilizing elements in yeast. Cell. 2014 Feb 13; 156(4):812-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  17. Nucleosome depletion at yeast terminators is not intrinsic and can occur by a transcriptional mechanism linked to 3'-end formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 19; 107(42):17945-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  18. Evidence against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Reply to "Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization.". Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Aug; 17(8):920-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  19. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 Aug; 16(8):847-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  20. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol Cell. 2005 Jun 10; 18(6):735-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  21. Chromatin immunoprecipitation for determining the association of proteins with specific genomic sequences in vivo. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2005 Feb; Chapter 21:Unit 21.3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  22. Eaf3 regulates the global pattern of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jan; 24(2):757-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  23. Mot1 associates with transcriptionally active promoters and inhibits association of NC2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Dec; 22(23):8122-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  24. Activator-specific recruitment of TFIID and regulation of ribosomal protein genes in yeast. Mol Cell. 2002 Apr; 9(4):823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  25. TFIIA has activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 28; 275(17):12374-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  26. Yeast homologues of higher eukaryotic TFIID subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10; 93(25):14654-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  27. SIRT7 links H3K18 deacetylation to maintenance of oncogenic transformation. Nature. 2012 Jul 05; 487(7405):114-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  28. Iwr1 protein is important for preinitiation complex formation by all three nuclear RNA polymerases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e20829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  29. High-throughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 07; 107(49):20998-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  30. Close association of RNA polymerase II and many transcription factors with Pol III genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23; 107(8):3639-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  31. Mapping accessible chromatin regions using Sono-Seq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 01; 106(35):14926-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  32. Systematic evaluation of variability in ChIP-chip experiments using predefined DNA targets. Genome Res. 2008 Mar; 18(3):393-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  33. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007 Jun 14; 447(7146):799-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.