Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

HMS faculty, help us improve the algorithms in Profiles by uploading your CV!

Daniel I Glazer, M.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications Daniel Glazer has written about Male.
Connection Strength

0.126
  1. Prevalence of imaging findings of acute pancreatitis in emergency department patients with elevated serum lipase. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 12; 50:10-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  2. Technologist Productivity and Accuracy in Assigning Protocols for Abdominal CT and MRI Examinations at an Academic Medical Center: Implications for Physician Workload. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 11; 213(5):1003-1007.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  3. Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Hepatic Tumors: Single-Center Experience With Intermediate to Long-Term Outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec; 209(6):1381-1389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  4. Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Sep; 209(3):W145-W151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  5. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: correlation with tumor cell density and percentage Gleason pattern on whole mount pathology. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 03; 42(3):918-925.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  6. Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement on CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Mar; 40(3):560-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  7. Assessment of 1 mSv urinary tract stone CT with model-based iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec; 203(6):1230-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  8. Adrenal Incidentaloma triage with single-source (fast-kilovoltage switch) dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug; 203(2):329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  9. SPECT/CT evaluation of unusual physiologic radioiodine biodistributions: pearls and pitfalls in image interpretation. Radiographics. 2013 Mar-Apr; 33(2):397-418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  10. Utility of Patient-Reported Risk Factors for Identifying Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Before Outpatient CT: Comparison With Recent ACR/NKF Consensus Criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 09; 219(3):462-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  11. Periprocedural factors associated with overall patient survival following percutaneous image-guided liver tumor cryoablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022; 39(1):34-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  12. Accelerated Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Prostate Imaging for Higher Resolution, Higher Geometric Fidelity, and Multi-b Perfusion Estimation. Invest Radiol. 2019 04; 54(4):238-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  13. Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 05; 43(5):1237-1244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  14. Bladder cancer diagnosis with CT urography: test characteristics and reasons for false-positive and false-negative results. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 03; 43(3):663-671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  15. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 01; 42(1):278-289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  16. Improving our PRODUCT: a quality and safety improvement project demonstrating the value of a preprocedural checklist for fluoroscopy. Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar; 22(3):400-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  17. Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2014 Jul; 272(1):132-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  18. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology. 2000 Jul; 216(1):284-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.