Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Eliezer Peli, O.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Eliezer Peli and Alexandra Bowers.
Connection Strength

8.738
  1. The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Sep; 8(5):14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.858
  2. Bioptic Telescope Use and Driving Patterns of Drivers with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Sep; 5(5):5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.695
  3. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 13; 55(3):1540-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.585
  4. Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb; 132(2):214-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.581
  5. A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms. Stroke Res Treat. 2012; 2012:176806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  6. Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec; 51(12):6605-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  7. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  8. Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May; 126(5):657-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  9. Bioptic telescopes meet the needs of drivers with moderate visual acuity loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jan; 46(1):66-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  10. Evaluation of a prototype Minified Augmented-View device for patients with impaired night vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Jul; 24(4):296-312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  11. Preferred retinal locus and reading rate with four dynamic text presentation formats. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Mar; 81(3):205-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.292
  12. Hazard Detection With Monocular Bioptic Telescopes in a Driving Simulator. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 03; 9(4):26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  13. Evaluation of a Paradigm to Investigate Detection of Road Hazards when Using a Bioptic Telescope. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 09; 95(9):785-794.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  14. Driving With Hemianopia VI: Peripheral Prisms and Perceptual-Motor Training Improve Detection in a Driving Simulator. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jan; 7(1):5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  15. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands? Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Sep; 6(5):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  16. Driving with central field loss III: vehicle control. Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Sep; 99(5):435-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  17. High-Power Prismatic Devices for Oblique Peripheral Prisms. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 05; 93(5):521-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  18. A Pilot Study of Perceptual-Motor Training for Peripheral Prisms. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Feb; 5(1):9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  19. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  20. Asymmetry in the Collision Judgments of People With Homonymous Field Defects and Left Hemispatial Neglect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jun; 56(6):4135-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  21. Peripheral prism glasses: effects of moving and stationary backgrounds. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Apr; 92(4):412-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  22. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 20; 55(1):368-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  23. Central visual field loss and driving--reply. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun; 131(6):819-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  24. Considering Apical Scotomas, Confusion, and Diplopia When Prescribing Prisms for Homonymous Hemianopia. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2013 May; 2(4):2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  25. The effect of strabismus on object detection in the ring scotoma of a monocular bioptic telescope. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jul; 33(4):550-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  26. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  27. Peripheral prism glasses: effects of dominance, suppression, and background. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Sep; 89(9):1343-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  28. Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec 06; 2011(Suppl 5):1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  29. Object detection in the ring scotoma of a monocular bioptic telescope. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 May; 129(5):611-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  30. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF VISION MULTIPLEXING DEVICES FOR VISION IMPAIRMENTS. Int J Artif Intell Tools. 2009 Jun 01; 18(3):365-378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  31. Applications of Augmented Vision Head-Mounted Systems in Vision Rehabilitation. J Soc Inf Disp. 2007 Dec; 15(12):1037-1045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  32. Establishing Mobility Measures to Assess the Effectiveness of Night Vision Devices: Results of a Pilot Study. J Vis Impair Blind. 2005 Oct; 99(10):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  33. On-road driving with moderate visual field loss. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Aug; 82(8):657-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  34. Peripheral Prisms Improve Obstacle Detection during Simulated Walking for Patients with Left Hemispatial Neglect and Hemianopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 09; 95(9):795-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  35. Mobile gaze tracking system for outdoor walking behavioral studies. J Vis. 2016; 16(3):27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.