Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Eliezer Peli, O.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Eliezer Peli and Russell Woods.
Connection Strength

4.513
  1. A relationship between tolerance of blur and personality. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov; 51(11):6077-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  2. Extended wearing trial of Trifield lens device for 'tunnel vision'. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 May; 30(3):240-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.436
  3. DLP-based dichoptic vision test system. J Biomed Opt. 2010 Jan-Feb; 15(1):016011.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  4. IMAGE ENHANCEMENT FOR IMPAIRED VISION: THE CHALLENGE OF EVALUATION. Int J Artif Intell Tools. 2009 Jun; 18(3):415-438.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  5. Wideband enhancement of television images for people with visual impairments. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2004 Jun; 21(6):937-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  6. Lateral interactions: size does matter. Vision Res. 2002 Mar; 42(6):733-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  7. Peripheral Prisms Improve Obstacle Detection during Simulated Walking for Patients with Left Hemispatial Neglect and Hemianopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 09; 95(9):795-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  8. Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 07 01; 58(9):3646-3655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  9. Factors affecting enhanced video quality preferences. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013 Dec; 22(12):5146-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  10. Psychophysical contrast calibration. Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20; 90:15-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  11. Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video. J Soc Inf Disp. 2012 Nov 01; 20(11):616-623.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  12. Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1364-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  13. Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr; 73(3):829-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  14. Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve. Vision Res. 2010 Jul 09; 50(15):1452-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  15. Inattentional blindness with the same scene at different scales. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar; 30(2):124-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  16. Collision judgment when using an augmented-vision head-mounted display device. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Sep; 50(9):4509-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  17. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 May; 86(5):492-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  18. Inattentional blindness and augmented-vision displays: effects of cartoon-like filtering and attended scene. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 May; 28(3):204-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  19. Measuring perceived video quality of MPEG enhancement by people with impaired vision. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Dec; 24(12):B174-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  20. A Feedback-Controlled Interface for Treadmill Locomotion in Virtual Environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept. 2007 Jan; 4(1):7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  21. Where people look when watching movies: do all viewers look at the same place? Comput Biol Med. 2007 Jul; 37(7):957-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  22. Thresholds vary between spatial and temporal forced-choice paradigms: the case of lateral interactions in peripheral vision. Spat Vis. 2005; 18(1):99-127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  23. Facilitation of contrast detection in near-peripheral vision. Vision Res. 2004 Dec; 44(27):3193-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  24. Tracking the line of primary gaze in a walking simulator: modeling and calibration. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov; 36(4):757-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  25. Preferred retinal locus and reading rate with four dynamic text presentation formats. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Mar; 81(3):205-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  26. Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity. Vision Res. 2003 Oct; 43(23):2427-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  27. Stereoacuity at distance and near. Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Dec; 79(12):771-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  28. Asymmetry in the Collision Judgments of People With Homonymous Field Defects and Left Hemispatial Neglect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jun; 56(6):4135-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.