Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Eliezer Peli, O.D.

Co-Author

This page shows the publications co-authored by Eliezer Peli and Jae-Hyun Jung.
Connection Strength

9.636
  1. Photographic Depiction of the Field of View with Spectacles-mounted Low Vision Aids. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 10 01; 98(10):1210-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.962
  2. Multi-periscopic prism device for field expansion. Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Sep 01; 11(9):4872-4889.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.888
  3. Field Expansion with Multiplexing Prism Glasses Improves Pedestrian Detection for Acquired Monocular Vision. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 07; 9(8):35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.885
  4. No Useful Field Expansion with Full-field Prisms. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 09; 95(9):805-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.777
  5. Field Expansion for Acquired Monocular Vision Using a Multiplexing Prism. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 09; 95(9):814-828.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.777
  6. Multiplexing Prisms for Field Expansion. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 08; 94(8):817-829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.720
  7. Comparing object recognition from binary and bipolar edge images for visual prostheses. J Electron Imaging. 2016 Nov; 25(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.691
  8. High-Power Prismatic Devices for Oblique Peripheral Prisms. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 05; 93(5):521-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.661
  9. Comparing object recognition from binary and bipolar edge features. IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2016; 2016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.651
  10. Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses. Vision Res. 2015 Jun; 111(Pt B):182-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.596
  11. Impact of high power and angle of incidence on prism corrections for visual field loss. Opt Eng. 2014 Jan 17; 53(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  12. Retinal prosthetic vision simulation: temporal aspects. J Neural Eng. 2021 08 24; 18(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  13. Preparing participants for the use of the tongue visual sensory substitution device. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Sep 30; 1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  14. Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  15. Design of 45° periscopic visual field expansion device for peripheral field loss. Opt Commun. 2020 Jan 01; 454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  16. Motion Parallax Improves Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter in Simulated Prosthetic Vision. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Sep; 7(5):29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  17. Measuring Pedestrian Collision Detection With Peripheral Field Loss and the Impact of Peripheral Prisms. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018; 7(5):1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  18. Word recognition: re-thinking prosthetic vision evaluation. J Neural Eng. 2018 10; 15(5):055003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
Connection Strength
The connection strength for co-authors is the sum of the scores for each of their shared publications.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.