Harvard Catalyst Profiles

Contact, publication, and social network information about Harvard faculty and fellows.

Jordana Phillips, M.D.

Concepts

This page shows the publications Jordana Phillips has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.091
  1. Key Ingredients of a Breast Imaging Fellowship-A Recipe for Success. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Oct; 15(10):1464-1470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  2. Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 10; 211(4):839-846.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  3. Workflow Considerations for Incorporation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Into a Breast Imaging Practice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Jun; 15(6):881-885.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  4. Video-Based Teaching of Image-Guided Breast Interventions: Stereotactic Core Biopsy Using a Prone Table. MedEdPORTAL. 2017 10 10; 13:10637.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  5. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes. Clin Imaging. 2017 Mar - Apr; 42:193-197.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  6. Educational Videos: An Effective Tool to Improve Training in Interventional Breast Procedures. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Jun; 13(6):719-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  7. Breast imaging in the transgender patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 May; 202(5):1149-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  8. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2019 Nov-Dec; 39(7):1907-1920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  9. Imaging Findings in Transgender Patients after Gender-affirming Surgery. Radiographics. 2019 Sep-Oct; 39(5):1368-1392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  10. Potential role of abbreviated MRI for breast cancer screening in an academic medical center. Breast J. 2019 07; 25(4):604-611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  11. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  12. Breast MRI ordering practices in a large health care network. Breast J. 2019 03; 25(2):262-268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  13. Interdisciplinary Management of Transgender Individuals at Risk for Breast Cancer: Case Reports and Review of the Literature. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 02; 19(1):e12-e19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  14. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Guide to Interpretation and Reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 01; 212(1):222-231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  15. Management of BIRADS 3, 4A, and 4B Lesions Diagnosed as Pure Papilloma by Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Necessary? Acad Radiol. 2019 07; 26(7):909-914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  16. Imaging of Breast Implant-associated Complications and Pathologic Conditions: Breast Imaging. Radiographics. 2017 Sep-Oct; 37(5):1603-1604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  17. Incidental liver lesions seen on Breast MRI: When is additional imaging warranted? Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct; 95:319-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  18. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  19. Prediction of Low versus High Recurrence Scores in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer on the Basis of Radiologic-Pathologic Features: Comparison with Oncotype DX Test Recurrence Scores. Radiology. 2016 Aug; 280(2):370-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  20. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program. Radiology. 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Funded by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through its Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, grant number UL1TR002541.